The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
Authors
Keywords
Peer review, Scientific publishing, Supply and demand, Entity disambiguation, Geographic distribution, Mathematical modeling, Sustainability science, Open access publishing
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages e0166387
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2016-11-11
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0166387
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence?
- (2016) David Moher et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- In appreciation of the peer-review heroes from 2015
- (2016) William Summerskill LANCET
- Matchmaker aims to cut journal shopping
- (2016) Robert H. S. Kraus NATURE
- Let’s make peer review scientific
- (2016) Drummond Rennie NATURE
- Does it take too long to publish research?
- (2016) Kendall Powell NATURE
- Author Disambiguation in PubMed: Evidence on the Precision and Recall of Author-ity among NIH-Funded Scientists
- (2016) Marc J. Lerchenmueller et al. PLoS One
- Rewarding Peer Reviewers - Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication
- (2015) Armen Yuri Gasparyan et al. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
- Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data
- (2015) Michail Kovanis et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Emerging trends in peer review—a survey
- (2015) Richard Walker et al. Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system
- (2014) Philip F Stahel et al. BMC Medicine
- Assessing Value in Biomedical Research
- (2014) John P. A. Ioannidis et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Review rewards
- (2014) NATURE
- Apply market forces to peer review
- (2014) Sascha Ott et al. NATURE
- Open access is tiring out peer reviewers
- (2014) Martijn Arns NATURE
- Imbalance in Individual Researcher's Peer Review Activities Quantified for Four British Ecological Society Journals, 2003-2010
- (2014) Owen L. Petchey et al. PLoS One
- Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping
- (2014) Kyle Siler et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Exploiting citation networks for large-scale author name disambiguation
- (2014) Christian Schulz et al. EPJ Data Science
- Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing
- (2013) Miranda Robertson BMC BIOLOGY
- Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review
- (2013) In-Uck Park et al. NATURE
- Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers
- (2012) Adrian Mulligan et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A decade in numbers
- (2012) NATURE MATERIALS
- Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns
- (2012) V. Calcagno et al. SCIENCE
- Quantifying the Volunteer Effort of Scientific Peer Reviewing
- (2011) Mary Golden et al. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
- The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009
- (2011) Mikael Laakso et al. PLoS One
- No crisis in supply of peer reviewers
- (2010) Tim Vines et al. NATURE
- Reviewing Peer Review
- (2008) B. Alberts et al. SCIENCE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now