Causal language and strength of inference in academic and media articles shared in social media (CLAIMS): A systematic review
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Causal language and strength of inference in academic and media articles shared in social media (CLAIMS): A systematic review
Authors
Keywords
Language, Social media, Facebook, Social research, Twitter, Systematic reviews, Publication ethics, Social networks
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages e0196346
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2018-05-31
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0196346
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Generalizing Study Results
- (2017) Catherine R. Lesko et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review
- (2017) Kellia Chiu et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Poor replication validity of biomedical association studies reported by newspapers
- (2017) Estelle Dumas-Mallet et al. PLoS One
- Causal Impact: Epidemiological Approaches for a Public Health of Consequence
- (2016) Daniel Westreich et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Efficacy of Statin Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2016) Magdalena Rysz-Górzynska et al. Scientific Reports
- Do celebrity endorsements matter? Observational study of BRCA gene testing and mastectomy rates after Angelina Jolie’s New York Times editorial
- (2016) Sunita Desai et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Impact of statin related media coverage on use of statins: interrupted time series analysis with UK primary care data
- (2016) Anthony Matthews et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful
- (2016) John P. A. Ioannidis PLOS MEDICINE
- Do celebrity endorsements matter? Observational study of BRCA gene testing and mastectomy rates after Angelina Jolie’s New York Times editorial
- (2016) Sunita Desai et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Impact of statin related media coverage on use of statins: interrupted time series analysis with UK primary care data
- (2016) Anthony Matthews et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Trials Using Statins in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
- (2016) Vidhu Anand et al. Pulmonary Circulation
- Offline: What is medicine's 5 sigma?
- (2015) Richard Horton LANCET
- Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News
- (2015) Romana Haneef et al. PLoS One
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2014) Isabelle Boutron et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study
- (2014) P. Sumner et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Internet publicity of data problems in the bioscience literature correlates with enhanced corrective action
- (2014) Paul S. Brookes PeerJ
- Belief beyond the evidence: using the proposed effect of breakfast on obesity to show 2 practices that distort scientific evidence
- (2013) Andrew W Brown et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
- Press Releases by Academic Medical Centers: Not So Academic?
- (2013) Steven Woloshin et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Observational studies often make clinical practice recommendations: an empirical evaluation of authors' attitudes
- (2013) Vinay Prasad et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- “Spin” in wound care research: the reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically non-significant primary outcome results or unspecified primary outcomes
- (2013) Suzanne Lockyer et al. Trials
- Impact of television coverage on the number and type of symptoms reported during a health scare: a retrospective pre–post observational study
- (2012) Kate Faasse et al. BMJ Open
- Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study
- (2012) Amélie Yavchitz et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- NIH Disease Funding Levels and Burden of Disease
- (2011) Leslie A. Gillum et al. PLoS One
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes
- (2010) Isabelle Boutron JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Use of Causal Language in Observational Studies of Obesity and Nutrition
- (2010) Stacey S. Cofield et al. Obesity Facts
- Editors, Publishers, Impact Factors, and Reprint Income
- (2010) Harvey Marcovitch PLOS MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Observational Studies Analyzed Like Randomized Experiments
- (2008) Miguel A. Hernán et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Use of breast cancer screening and treatment services by Australian women aged 25-44 years following Kylie Minogue's breast cancer diagnosis
- (2008) M. Kelaher et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
- (2008) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- How Do US Journalists Cover Treatments, Tests, Products, and Procedures? An Evaluation of 500 Stories
- (2008) Gary Schwitzer PLOS MEDICINE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now