Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
Authors
Keywords
Clinicaltrials.gov, Primary outcome, Publication bias, Reporting bias, Selection bias, Trial registration
Journal
BMC Medicine
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-11-18
DOI
10.1186/s12916-015-0520-3
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
- (2015) Anthony Chauvin et al. BMC Medicine
- Sa1215 Poor Reporting of Crohn's Disease Trials in Clinicaltrials.Gov
- (2015) Susan Hutfless et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Reporting Discrepancies Between the ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database and Peer-Reviewed Publications
- (2014) Daniel M. Hartung et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Registration and design alterations of clinical trials in critical care: a cross-sectional observational study
- (2014) Vijay Anand et al. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
- Outcome Reporting Among Drug Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2013) Florence T. Bourgeois ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer
- (2013) F. E. Vera-Badillo et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trial Registry Entries and Content of Reports in Surgery Journals
- (2013) Rachel Rosenthal et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions
- (2013) Gerjon Hannink et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals
- (2013) Shane Killeen et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Discrepancies between registered and published primary outcome specifications in analgesic trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations
- (2013) Shannon M. Smith et al. PAIN
- Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process
- (2013) Sylvain Mathieu et al. PLoS One
- Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials of gastroenterology and hepatology
- (2013) Xiao-Qian Li et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Prospective registration, bias risk and outcome-reporting bias in randomised clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine: an empirical methodological study
- (2013) Jian-Ping Liu et al. BMJ Open
- Publication of Sports Medicine–Related Randomized Controlled Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2012) Jaskarndip Chahal et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Quality of Registration for Clinical Trials Published in Emergency Medicine Journals
- (2012) Christopher W. Jones et al. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
- Association of industry funding with the outcome and quality of randomized controlled trials of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis
- (2012) Nasim A. Khan et al. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
- Characteristics of Clinical Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010
- (2012) Robert M. Califf JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Comparison of Arthroplasty Trial Publications After Registration in ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2012) Holly N. Smith et al. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
- Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review
- (2012) Helen Nankervis et al. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
- Many Randomized Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions Are Not Adequately Registered: A Survey of 200 Published Trials
- (2012) R. Z. Pinto et al. PHYSICAL THERAPY
- Comparison of published orthopaedic trauma trials following registration in Clinicaltrials.gov
- (2011) Rajiv Gandhi et al. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
- Misleading abstract conclusions in randomized controlled trials in rheumatology: Comparison of the abstract conclusions and the results section
- (2011) Sylvain Mathieu et al. JOINT BONE SPINE
- Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic Review
- (2011) Benoit You et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Treatment of Acute Otitis Media in Children
- (2011) NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database — Update and Key Issues
- (2011) Deborah A. Zarin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy
- (2011) Mirjana Huić et al. PLoS One
- Characteristics of randomised trials on diseases in the digestive system registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: a retrospective analysis
- (2011) S. Wildt et al. BMJ Open
- Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A systematic review
- (2010) Katherine Milette et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
- Undisclosed Changes in Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Observational Study
- (2009) R. Ewart et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2009) Sylvain Mathieu JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Trial Publication after Registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
- (2009) Joseph S. Ross et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started