Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review
Authors
Keywords
Adverse events, Database searching, Meta-analysis, Systematic reviews, Adverse reactions, Clinical trials, Publication ethics, Scientific publishing
Journal
PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages e1002127
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2016-09-21
DOI
10.1371/journal.pmed.1002127
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Changes to registration elements and results in a cohort of Clinicaltrials.gov trials were not reflected in published articles
- (2016) Shelly Pranić et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials
- (2016) Alex Hodkinson et al. Trials
- Comparison of serious adverse events posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in corresponding journal articles
- (2015) Eve Tang et al. BMC Medicine
- Compliance with Results Reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2015) Monique L. Anderson et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Information on new drugs at market entry: retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports
- (2015) M. Kohler et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Are manufacturers sharing data as promised?
- (2015) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence
- (2015) Joanna Le Noury et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Information on new drugs at market entry: retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports
- (2015) M. Kohler et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Are manufacturers sharing data as promised?
- (2015) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence
- (2015) Joanna Le Noury et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Reporting Discrepancies Between the ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database and Peer-Reviewed Publications
- (2014) Daniel M. Hartung et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Impact of Inclusion of Industry Trial Results Registries as an Information Source for Systematic Reviews
- (2014) Regine Potthast et al. PLoS One
- Differences in reporting serious adverse events in industry sponsored clinical trial registries and journal articles on antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs: a cross-sectional study
- (2014) S. Hughes et al. BMJ Open
- Dabigatran: how the drug company withheld important analyses
- (2014) D. Cohen BMJ-British Medical Journal
- US Food and Drug Administration documents can provide unpublished evidence relevant to systematic reviews
- (2013) Marian S. McDonagh et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011
- (2013) Su Golder et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Aspirin Therapy and Risk of Subdural Hematoma: Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
- (2013) Ben J. Connolly et al. Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases
- Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension
- (2013) Alex Hodkinson et al. BMJ Open
- Reporting of industry funded study outcome data: comparison of confidential and published data on the safety and effectiveness of rhBMP-2 for spinal fusion
- (2013) M. A. Rodgers et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Timing and Completeness of Trial Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and Published in Journals
- (2013) Carolina Riveros et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Completeness of Reporting of Patient-Relevant Clinical Trial Outcomes: Comparison of Unpublished Clinical Study Reports with Publicly Available Data
- (2013) Beate Wieseler et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The effect of linagliptin on glycaemic control and tolerability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2012) D. Singh-Franco et al. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
- The Evolution of Trial Registries and Their Use to Assess the Clinical Trial Enterprise
- (2012) Kay Dickersin JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience
- (2012) Peter Doshi et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned
- (2011) Eugene J. Carragee et al. Spine Journal
- Insomnia medication: Do published studies reflect the complete picture of efficacy and safety?
- (2010) Taina Mattila et al. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
- Unpublished data can be of value in systematic reviews of adverse effects: methodological overview
- (2010) Su Golder et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals
- (2010) Anna-Bettina Haidich et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2009) ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort
- (2009) Mieke L. van Driel et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Is there evidence for biased reporting of published adverse effects data in pharmaceutical industry-funded studies?
- (2008) Su Golder et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program
- (2008) Roger Chou et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search