Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 86-95
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2017-10-06
DOI
10.1111/medu.13462
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Motivation of Dutch high school students from various backgrounds for applying to study medicine: a qualitative study
- (2017) Anouk Wouters et al. BMJ Open
- The relationship between extracurricular activities assessed during selection and during medical school and performance
- (2016) Louise C. Urlings-Strop et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Scoring method of a Situational Judgment Test: influence on internal consistency reliability, adverse impact and correlation with personality?
- (2016) W. E. De Leng et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- CASPer, an online pre-interview screen for personal/professional characteristics: prediction of national licensure scores
- (2016) Kelly L. Dore et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- The effect of curriculum sample selection for medical school
- (2016) Marieke de Visser et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Selection of medical students on the basis of non-academic skills: is it worth the trouble?
- (2016) A. S. M. Niessen et al. CLINICAL MEDICINE
- Widening access in selection using situational judgement tests: evidence from the UKCAT
- (2016) Filip Lievens et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Lottery for medical school admission
- (2016) Dieneke Hubbeling MEDICAL TEACHER
- How Different Medical School Selection Processes Call upon Different Personality Characteristics
- (2016) Nienke R. Schripsema et al. PLoS One
- Predicting Performance in Higher Education Using Proximal Predictors
- (2016) A. Susan M. Niessen et al. PLoS One
- Non-cognitive selected students do not outperform lottery-admitted students in the pre-clinical stage of medical school
- (2015) Susanna M. Lucieer et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Underlying factors in medical school admissions
- (2015) Nienke R Schripsema et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Predicting performance: relative importance of students’ background and past performance
- (2015) Karen M Stegers-Jager et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review
- (2015) Fiona Patterson et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Predictors of professional behaviour and academic outcomes in a UK medical school: A longitudinal cohort study
- (2015) Jane Adam et al. MEDICAL TEACHER
- Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions
- (2015) Adrian Husbands et al. BMC Medical Education
- Diversity in medical school admission: insights from personnel recruitment and selection
- (2014) Filip Lievens MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Ethnic and social disparities in performance on medical school selection criteria
- (2014) Karen M Stegers-Jager et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Selection and study performance: comparing three admission processes within one medical school
- (2014) Nienke R Schripsema et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Selecting medical students: An unresolved challenge
- (2014) David Powis MEDICAL TEACHER
- The ‘Dark Side’ and ‘Bright Side’ of Personality: When Too Much Conscientiousness and Too Little Anxiety Are Detrimental with Respect to the Acquisition of Medical Knowledge and Skill
- (2014) Eamonn Ferguson et al. PLoS One
- Adjusting medical school admission: assessing interpersonal skills using situational judgement tests
- (2013) Filip Lievens MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Academic and non-academic selection criteria in predicting medical school performance
- (2013) Louise C. Urlings-Strop et al. MEDICAL TEACHER
- Prediction and prevention of failure: An early intervention to assist at-risk medical students
- (2013) Kalman A. Winston et al. MEDICAL TEACHER
- Socio-economic predictors of performance in the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT)
- (2013) Ian B Puddey et al. BMC Medical Education
- Should Efforts in Favor of Medical Student Diversity Be Focused During Admissions or Farther Upstream?
- (2012) Harold I. Reiter et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Association Between a Medical School Admission Process Using the Multiple Mini-interview and National Licensing Examination Scores
- (2012) Kevin W. Eva et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Widening access to UK medical education for under-represented socioeconomic groups: modelling the impact of the UKCAT in the 2009 cohort
- (2012) P. A. Tiffin et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Selected medical students achieve better than lottery-admitted students during clerkships
- (2011) Louise C Urlings-Strop et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Medical school dropout - testing at admission versus selection by highest grades as predictors
- (2011) Lotte O’Neill et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference
- (2011) David Prideaux et al. MEDICAL TEACHER
- Non-cognitive factors in health sciences education: from the clinic floor to the cutting room floor
- (2009) Geoff Norman ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Impact of problem-based, active learning on graduation rates for 10 generations of Dutch medical students
- (2009) Henk G Schmidt et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Why are there so few working-class applicants to medical schools? Learning from the success stories
- (2009) Jonathan Mathers et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Selection of medical students: a controlled experiment
- (2009) Louise C Urlings-Strop et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees
- (2009) Kevin W Eva et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started