- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Publication bias and the canonization of false facts
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
eLife
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Online
2016-12-20
DOI
10.7554/elife.21451
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Go forth and replicate!
- (2016) NATURE
- 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
- (2016) Monya Baker NATURE
- Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates
- (2016) Anders Eklund et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
- (2016) C. F. Camerer et al. SCIENCE
- Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions
- (2016) Andrew D. Higginson et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Agreements between Industry and Academia on Publication Rights: A Retrospective Study of Protocols and Publications of Randomized Clinical Trials
- (2016) Benjamin Kasenda et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence
- (2015) Joanna Le Noury et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence
- (2015) Joanna Le Noury et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery
- (2015) Richard McElreath et al. PLoS One
- The Statistical Crisis in Science
- (2014) Andrew Gelman et al. AMERICAN SCIENTIST
- Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture
- (2014) N. Matosin et al. Disease Models & Mechanisms
- Reanalyses of Randomized Clinical Trial Data
- (2014) Shanil Ebrahim et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results
- (2014) Marcel A. L. M. van Assen et al. PLoS One
- Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
- (2014) A. Franco et al. SCIENCE
- An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
- (2014) Timothy M Errington et al. eLife
- Why Selective Publication of Statistically Significant Results Can Be Effective
- (2013) Joost de Winter et al. PLoS One
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
- (2012) C. Glenn Begley et al. NATURE
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy
- (2008) Erick H. Turner et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationPublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More