标题
Publication bias and the canonization of false facts
作者
关键词
-
出版物
eLife
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
发表日期
2016-12-20
DOI
10.7554/elife.21451
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Go forth and replicate!
- (2016) NATURE
- 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
- (2016) Monya Baker NATURE
- Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates
- (2016) Anders Eklund et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
- (2016) C. F. Camerer et al. SCIENCE
- Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions
- (2016) Andrew D. Higginson et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Agreements between Industry and Academia on Publication Rights: A Retrospective Study of Protocols and Publications of Randomized Clinical Trials
- (2016) Benjamin Kasenda et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence
- (2015) Joanna Le Noury et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence
- (2015) Joanna Le Noury et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery
- (2015) Richard McElreath et al. PLoS One
- The Statistical Crisis in Science
- (2014) Andrew Gelman et al. AMERICAN SCIENTIST
- Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture
- (2014) N. Matosin et al. Disease Models & Mechanisms
- Reanalyses of Randomized Clinical Trial Data
- (2014) Shanil Ebrahim et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results
- (2014) Marcel A. L. M. van Assen et al. PLoS One
- Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
- (2014) A. Franco et al. SCIENCE
- An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
- (2014) Timothy M Errington et al. eLife
- Why Selective Publication of Statistically Significant Results Can Be Effective
- (2013) Joost de Winter et al. PLoS One
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
- (2012) C. Glenn Begley et al. NATURE
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy
- (2008) Erick H. Turner et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started