An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
eLife
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Online
2014-12-09
DOI
10.7554/elife.04333
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility
- (2014) Francis S. Collins et al. NATURE
- Preclinical research: Make mouse studies work
- (2014) Steve Perrin NATURE
- Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws
- (2014) B. Alberts et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research
- (2014) E. Miguel et al. SCIENCE
- Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
- (2014) John P.A. Ioannidis et al. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- Sorting Out the FACS: A Devil in the Details
- (2014) William C. Hines et al. Cell Reports
- The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age
- (2013) Timothy H. Vines et al. CURRENT BIOLOGY
- NIH mulls rules for validating key results
- (2013) Meredith Wadman NATURE
- Reproducibility: The risks of the replication drive
- (2013) Mina Bissell NATURE
- Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies
- (2013) Benjamin Haibe-Kains et al. NATURE
- Reproducibility of research and preclinical validation: problems and solutions
- (2013) Lajos Pusztai et al. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- A Survey on Data Reproducibility in Cancer Research Provides Insights into Our Limited Ability to Translate Findings from the Laboratory to the Clinic
- (2013) Aaron Mobley et al. PLoS One
- On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature
- (2013) Nicole A. Vasilevsky et al. PeerJ
- Irreproducible Experimental Results
- (2012) Joseph Loscalzo CIRCULATION
- Correction: Editorial note
- (2012) NATURE
- A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
- (2012) Story C. Landis et al. NATURE
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
- (2012) C. Glenn Begley et al. NATURE
- Statistical Design Considerations in Animal Studies Published Recently inCancer Research
- (2011) Kenneth R. Hess CANCER RESEARCH
- Replication and reproducibility in spinal cord injury research
- (2011) Oswald Steward et al. EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
- Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance
- (2011) Sander Nieuwenhuis et al. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
- Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
- (2011) Florian Prinz et al. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- Again, and Again, and Again ...
- (2011) B. R. Jasny et al. SCIENCE
- Improving Validation Practices in "Omics" Research
- (2011) J. P. A. Ioannidis et al. SCIENCE
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now