How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited
Authors
Keywords
Metrics, Citations, Influence, Science, Status
Journal
RESEARCH POLICY
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 104484
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2022-01-19
DOI
10.1016/j.respol.2022.104484
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Global citation inequality is on the rise
- (2021) Mathias Wullum Nielsen et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Does double‐blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top computer science conference
- (2021) Mengyi Sun et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists
- (2020) Kyle R. Myers et al. Nature Human Behaviour
- Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations
- (2019) Erin C McKiernan et al. eLife
- What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018
- (2019) Iman Tahamtan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Measuring discursive influence across scholarship
- (2018) Aaron Gerow et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The Matthew effect in science funding
- (2018) Thijs Bol et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Toward a more scientific science
- (2018) Pierre Azoulay et al. SCIENCE
- Citations in Scientific Texts: Do Social Relations Matter?
- (2018) Béatrice Milard et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?
- (2018) Iman Tahamtan et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Explicit Bias Toward High-Income-Country Research: A Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Experiment Of English Clinicians
- (2017) Matthew Harris et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review
- (2017) Andrew Tomkins et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Quantifying perceived impact of scientific publications
- (2017) Filippo Radicchi et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Citation behavior: A large-scale test of the persuasion by name-dropping hypothesis
- (2016) Tove Faber Frandsen et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- The incidence and role of negative citations in science
- (2015) Christian Catalini et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The social circles behind scientific references: Relationships between citing and cited authors in chemistry publications
- (2014) Béatrice Milard Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Matthew: Effect or Fable?
- (2013) Pierre Azoulay et al. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
- Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact
- (2013) Dashun Wang et al. SCIENCE
- Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing
- (2012) A. W. Wilhite et al. SCIENCE
- Status, Quality, and Attention: What's in a (Missing) Name?
- (2010) Timothy S. Simcoe et al. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
- Metrics: Do metrics matter?
- (2010) Alison Abbott et al. NATURE
- Strategic Reading, Ontologies, and the Future of Scientific Publishing
- (2009) A. H. Renear et al. SCIENCE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started