The Matthew effect in science funding

Matched control groups for modeling events in citation data: An illustration of nobel prize effects in citation networks

(2017) Rudolf Farys et al.   Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Science’s 1%: How income inequality is getting worse in research

(2016) Corie Lok   NATURE

Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact

(2016) R. Sinatra et al.   SCIENCE

Anatomy of funded research in science

(2015) Athen Ma et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?

(2015) D. Li et al.   SCIENCE

Field experiments of success-breeds-success dynamics

(2014) A. van de Rijt et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Matthew: Effect or Fable?

(2013) Pierre Azoulay et al.   MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment

(2013) L. Muchnik et al.   SCIENCE

Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact

(2013) Dashun Wang et al.   SCIENCE

Top performers are not the most impressive when extreme performance indicates unreliability

(2012) J. Denrell et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Critical Truths About Power Laws

(2012) M. P. H. Stumpf et al.   SCIENCE

Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure

(2012) Flaminio Squazzoni et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Status, Quality, and Attention: What's in a (Missing) Name?

(2010) Timothy S. Simcoe et al.   MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity

(2010) A. M. Petersen et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data

(2009) Aaron Clauset et al.   SIAM REVIEW