Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
eLife
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Online
2019-07-31
DOI
10.7554/elife.47338
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?
- (2019) Juan P Alperin et al. eLife
- Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
- (2018) Björn Brembs Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure
- (2018) David Moher et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
- (2017) Denes Szucs et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Publish or impoverish
- (2017) Wei Quan et al. Aslib Journal of Information Management
- How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers
- (2016) J K Tijdink et al. BMJ Open
- Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
- (2015) Diana Hicks et al. NATURE
- The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
- (2014) R. Chris Fraley et al. PLoS One
- The Disaster of the Impact Factor
- (2014) Khaled Moustafa SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania
- (2014) A. Casadevall et al. mBio
- Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals
- (2013) Laura E Chess et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
- (2013) Björn Brembs et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature
- (2013) Stephen A Bustin et al. NATURE METHODS
- A Survey on Data Reproducibility in Cancer Research Provides Insights into Our Limited Ability to Translate Findings from the Laboratory to the Clinic
- (2013) Aaron Mobley et al. PLoS One
- Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
- (2011) Florian Prinz et al. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment
- (2010) Robin L Walker et al. BMC Medical Education
- Bias in genetic association studies and impact factor
- (2009) M R Munafò et al. MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
- History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences
- (2009) Éric Archambault et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now