Does double‐blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top computer science conference

Confirmatory bias in peer review

(2020) J. A. Garcia et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Effectiveness of anonymization in double-blind review

(2018) C. Le Goues et al.   COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM

Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals

(2018) Giangiacomo Bravo et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review

(2017) Andrew Tomkins et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

The Game Between a Biased Reviewer and His Editor

(2017) J. A. García et al.   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers?

(2017) Marco Seeber et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige

(2016) Kanu Okike et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

(2016) Ludo Waltman   Journal of Informetrics

Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact

(2013) Dashun Wang et al.   SCIENCE

Bias in peer review

(2012) Carole J. Lee et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards

(2011) D. K. Ginther et al.   SCIENCE

Automatically profiling the author of an anonymous text

(2009) Shlomo Argamon et al.   COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM

The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics

(2009) Vincent Larivière et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY