Empirical Comparisons of 12 Meta-analysis Methods for Synthesizing Proportions of Binary Outcomes
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Empirical Comparisons of 12 Meta-analysis Methods for Synthesizing Proportions of Binary Outcomes
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2021-09-10
DOI
10.1007/s11606-021-07098-5
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
- (2020) Celina Borges Migliavaca et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data
- (2020) Ke Ju et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- A Bayesian multivariate meta‐analysis of prevalence data
- (2020) Lianne Siegel et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Meta-analysis of Proportions Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models
- (2020) Lifeng Lin et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2020) John Allotey et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta‐analysis of single proportions
- (2019) Guido Schwarzer et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies
- (2018) Ralf Bender et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- A comparison of one-stage vs two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis methods: A simulation study
- (2018) Evangelos Kontopantelis Research Synthesis Methods
- When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?
- (2018) Dan Jackson et al. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses
- (2018) Dean Langan et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Prevalence of Depression, Depressive Symptoms, and Suicidal Ideation Among Medical Students
- (2016) Lisa S. Rotenstein et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2014) Wan Ling Wong et al. Lancet Global Health
- Meta-analysis of prevalence
- (2013) Jan J Barendregt et al. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- The effects of excluding treatments from network meta-analyses: survey
- (2013) E. J. Mills et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Empirical Evaluation of Very Large Treatment Effects of Medical Interventions
- (2012) Tiago V. Pereira et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology
- (2010) David I. Warton et al. ECOLOGY
- Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data
- (2010) Theo Stijnen et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models
- (2009) Haitao Chu et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability
- (2007) Taye H. Hamza et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started