A comparison of one-stage vs two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis methods: A simulation study
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A comparison of one-stage vs two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis methods: A simulation study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Research Synthesis Methods
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-05-22
DOI
10.1002/jrsm.1303
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A comparison of 20 heterogeneity variance estimators in statistical synthesis of results from studies: a simulation study
- (2017) Maria Petropoulou et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A comparison of existing methods for multiple imputation in individual participant data meta-analysis
- (2017) Deborah Kunkel et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Simulation-Based Power Calculations for Mixed Effects Modeling: ipdpower in Stata
- (2016) Evangelos Kontopantelis et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information
- (2016) Hairui Hua et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Handling incomplete correlated continuous and binary outcomes in meta-analysis of individual participant data
- (2016) Manuel Gomes et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ
- (2016) Danielle L. Burke et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Multiple imputation for harmonizing longitudinal non-commensurate measures in individual participant data meta-analysis
- (2015) Juned Siddique et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Multiple imputation for IPD meta-analysis: allowing for heterogeneity and studies with missing covariates
- (2015) M. Quartagno et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology
- (2015) Thomas P. A. Debray et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis for a Binary Outcome: One-Stage or Two-Stage?
- (2013) Thomas P. A. Debray et al. PLoS One
- A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses
- (2013) Evangelos Kontopantelis et al. PLoS One
- Combining multiple imputation and meta-analysis with individual participant data
- (2013) Stephen Burgess et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Multiple imputation for handling systematically missing confounders in meta-analysis of individual participant data
- (2013) Matthieu Resche-Rigon et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Meta-analysis of randomised trials with a continuous outcome according to baseline imbalance and availability of individual participant data
- (2013) Richard D. Riley et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A comparison between DerSimonian–Laird and restricted maximum likelihood
- (2012) Evangelos Kontopantelis et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A simulation study
- (2010) Evangelos Kontopantelis et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Meta-analysis of a binary outcome using individual participant data and aggregate data
- (2010) Richard D. Riley et al. Research Synthesis Methods
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now