How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-04-27
DOI
10.1186/s12874-020-00975-3
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta‐analysis of single proportions
- (2019) Guido Schwarzer et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Establishing the Prevalence and Prevalence at Birth of Hemophilia in Males
- (2019) Alfonso Iorio et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidence
- (2019) Falk Hoffmann et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
- (2018) Matthew D. F. McInnes et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- An International Educational Training Course for Conducting Systematic Reviews in Health Care: The Joanna Briggs Institute's Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program
- (2018) Cindy Stern et al. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
- Basics of meta-analysis:I2is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity
- (2017) Michael Borenstein et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis
- (2016) Joanna IntHout et al. BMJ Open
- Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients
- (2015) A. Iorio et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients
- (2015) A. Iorio et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Meta-analysis of prevalence
- (2013) Jan J Barendregt et al. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead
- (2008) Gerta Rücker et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Meta-analyses of the incidence and prevalence of schizophrenia: conceptual and methodological issues
- (2008) Sukanta Saha et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started