Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
Authors
Keywords
Systematic reviews, Global health, Pediatrics, Database searching, Children, Comparative effectiveness research, Language, Infants
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages e0244878
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2021-01-13
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0244878
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Core outcome set for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children and young people
- (2020) F. C. Sherratt et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Core outcome sets through the healthcare ecosystem: the case of type 2 diabetes mellitus
- (2020) Susanna Dodd et al. Trials
- Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- (2020) Theo Vos et al. LANCET
- Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
- (2020) Paula R Williamson et al. BMJ Open
- Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
- (2019) Elizabeth Gargon et al. PLoS One
- Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
- (2018) Katherine Davis et al. PLoS One
- Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
- (2018) Elizabeth Gargon et al. PLoS One
- The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
- (2017) Paula R. Williamson et al. Trials
- Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
- (2017) Jamie J. Kirkham et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
- (2016) Jamie J. Kirkham et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- International and Interdisciplinary Identification of Health Care Transition Outcomes
- (2016) Cynthia Fair et al. JAMA Pediatrics
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
- (2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al. PLoS One
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps
- (2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al. PLoS One
- The Importance of Integration of Stakeholder Views in Core Outcome Set Development: Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate
- (2015) Nicola L. Harman et al. PLoS One
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
- (2014) Elizabeth Gargon et al. PLoS One
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExplorePublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More