Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries

(2018) Katherine Davis et al.   PLoS One

Global health trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise

(2018) Anna Rosala-Hallas et al.   Trials

Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys

(2018) Alice M. Biggane et al.   Trials

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

(2017) Paula R. Williamson et al.   Trials

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations

(2017) Jamie J. Kirkham et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement

(2016) Jamie J. Kirkham et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey

(2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al.   PLoS One

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps

(2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al.   PLoS One

Standardized Outcome Measurement for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus From the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM)

(2015) R. L. McNamara et al.   Journal of the American Heart Association

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review

(2014) Elizabeth Gargon et al.   PLoS One

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

(2009) David Moher et al.   PLOS MEDICINE