Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement

(2019) Jamie J. Kirkham et al.   Trials

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries

(2018) Katherine Davis et al.   PLoS One

Development of a Core Outcome Set for studies evaluating the effects of anaesthesia on perioperative morbidity and mortality following hip fracture surgery

(2018) C.M. O'Donnell et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

(2018) Elizabeth Gargon et al.   PLoS One

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

(2017) Paula R. Williamson et al.   Trials

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations

(2017) Jamie J. Kirkham et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement

(2016) Jamie J. Kirkham et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey

(2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al.   PLoS One

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps

(2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al.   PLoS One

Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review

(2015) Elizabeth Gargon et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review

(2014) Elizabeth Gargon et al.   PLoS One

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

(2009) David Moher et al.   PLOS MEDICINE