Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
Authors
Keywords
Systematic reviews, Database searching, Clinical trials, Comparative effectiveness research, Drug research and development, Global health, Database and informatics methods, Geographical locations
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages e0190695
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2018-02-14
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0190695
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
- (2017) Paula R. Williamson et al. Trials
- International patient and physician consensus on a psoriatic arthritis core outcome set for clinical trials
- (2016) Ana-Maria Orbai et al. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
- Development of a core outcome set for epilepsy in pregnancy (E-CORE): a national multi-stakeholder modified Delphi consensus study
- (2016) BH Al Wattar et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Developing a core set of patient-reported outcomes in pancreatic cancer: A Delphi survey
- (2016) Arja Gerritsen et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Clinicians’ perspective on key domains in ANCA-associated vasculitis: a Delphi exercise
- (2016) N Milman et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
- Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
- (2016) Jamie J. Kirkham et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
- (2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al. PLoS One
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps
- (2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al. PLoS One
- Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
- (2015) Elizabeth Gargon et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Connective Tissue Disease-associated Interstitial Lung Diseases (CTD-ILD) -- Report from OMERACT CTD-ILD Working Group
- (2015) D. Khanna et al. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
- Strategy for Standardization of Preeclampsia Research Study Design
- (2014) Leslie Myatt et al. HYPERTENSION
- Report of the NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain
- (2014) Richard A. Deyo et al. JOURNAL OF PAIN
- Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste
- (2014) Malcolm R Macleod et al. LANCET
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
- (2014) Elizabeth Gargon et al. PLoS One
- Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Report From the Institute of Medicine
- (2013) Harold C. Sox ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Development of maternal and neonatal composite outcomes for trials evaluating management of late-onset pre-eclampsia
- (2013) F. Fong et al. HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY
- Development of a Core Set of Outcomes for Randomized Controlled Trials with Multiple Outcomes – Example of Pulp Treatments of Primary Teeth for Extensive Decay in Children
- (2013) Violaine Smaïl-Faugeron et al. PLoS One
- Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years
- (2013) Jamie J Kirkham et al. Trials
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
- (2012) Paula R Williamson et al. Trials
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started