Legal regulations, ethical guidelines and recent policies to increase transparency of clinical trials
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Legal regulations, ethical guidelines and recent policies to increase transparency of clinical trials
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2020-02-04
DOI
10.1111/bcp.14223
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Clinical trial registration and reporting: a survey of academic organizations in the United States
- (2018) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. BMC Medicine
- Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions
- (2018) Guowei Li et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
- (2018) Matthew J Page et al. BMJ Open
- Clinical trial design and dissemination: comprehensive analysis of clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed data since 2005
- (2018) Magdalena Zwierzyna et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- How to avoid common problems when using ClinicalTrials.gov in research: 10 issues to consider
- (2018) Tony Tse et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Clinical trial design and dissemination: comprehensive analysis of clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed data since 2005
- (2018) Magdalena Zwierzyna et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- How to avoid common problems when using ClinicalTrials.gov in research: 10 issues to consider
- (2018) Tony Tse et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Illegitimate authorship and flawed procedures: Fundamental, formal criticisms of the Declaration of Helsinki
- (2018) Hans-Joerg Ehni et al. BIOETHICS
- Data sharing from pharmaceutical industry sponsored clinical studies: audit of data availability
- (2018) Ashley M. Hopkins et al. BMC Medicine
- Compliance with requirement to report results on the EU Clinical Trials Register: cohort study and web resource
- (2018) Ben Goldacre et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Social media and clinical trials: The pros and cons gain context when the patient is at the center
- (2018) Michael A. Thompson et al. CANCER
- Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study
- (2018) Constance X. Zou et al. Trials
- Overview and experience of the YODA Project with clinical trial data sharing after 5 years
- (2018) Joseph S. Ross et al. Scientific Data
- Data sharing statements for clinical trials: a requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
- (2017) Darren B Taichman et al. LANCET
- The changing landscape of clinical trial and approval processes in China
- (2017) Qing Zhou et al. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Association of the FDA Amendment Act with trial registration, publication, and outcome reporting
- (2017) Adam T. Phillips et al. Trials
- Current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors, 2011–2013
- (2017) Sohyun Jeong et al. Trials
- Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations
- (2017) Christian Ohmann et al. BMJ Open
- Clinical trial transparency: a reassessment of industry compliance with clinical trial registration and reporting requirements in the United States
- (2017) Scott M Lassman et al. BMJ Open
- Comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials
- (2016) A. Perlmutter et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning
- (2016) Rafael Dal-Ré et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- Trial Reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov — The Final Rule
- (2016) Deborah A. Zarin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Dependability of results in conference abstracts of randomized controlled trials in ophthalmology and author financial conflicts of interest as a factor associated with full publication
- (2016) Ian J. Saldanha et al. Trials
- Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials
- (2016) Alex Hodkinson et al. Trials
- Publication and reporting of clinical trial results: cross sectional analysis across academic medical centers
- (2016) Ruijun Chen et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Publication and reporting of clinical trial results: cross sectional analysis across academic medical centers
- (2016) Ruijun Chen et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Compliance with Results Reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2015) Monique L. Anderson et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Clinical trial registration, reporting, publication and FDAAA compliance: a cross-sectional analysis and ranking of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2012
- (2015) Jennifer E Miller et al. BMJ Open
- The Package Insert
- (2014) DAVID MCMAHON et al. Journal of Psychiatric Practice
- Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
- (2014) An-Wen Chan et al. LANCET
- The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials: Still a Problem
- (2014) Roderik F. Viergever et al. PLoS One
- Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries
- (2014) Christine Schmucker et al. PLoS One
- Benefits and harms in clinical trials of duloxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of clinical study reports, trial registries, and publications
- (2014) E. Maund et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Completeness of Reporting of Patient-Relevant Clinical Trial Outcomes: Comparison of Unpublished Clinical Study Reports with Publicly Available Data
- (2013) Beate Wieseler et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started