Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials
Authors
Keywords
Harms, Orlistat, Clinical study report, Adverse event, Adverse effect, Randomised controlled trial, Systematic review, Evidence-based healthcare, Obesity
Journal
Trials
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-04-19
DOI
10.1186/s13063-016-1327-z
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence
- (2015) Joanna Le Noury et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence
- (2015) Joanna Le Noury et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
- (2014) F Song et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Benefits and harms in clinical trials of duloxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of clinical study reports, trial registries, and publications
- (2014) E. Maund et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension
- (2013) Alex Hodkinson et al. BMJ Open
- European drug agency's attempts to improve transparency stalled by legal action from two US drug companies
- (2013) C. Dyer BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: a call for people to publish the findings
- (2013) P. Doshi et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Orlistat and the risk of acute liver injury: self controlled case series study in UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink
- (2013) I. J. Douglas et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Reporting of industry funded study outcome data: comparison of confidential and published data on the safety and effectiveness of rhBMP-2 for spinal fusion
- (2013) M. A. Rodgers et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Differences in Reporting of Analyses in Internal Company Documents Versus Published Trial Reports: Comparisons in Industry-Sponsored Trials in Off-Label Uses of Gabapentin
- (2013) S. Swaroop Vedula et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Completeness of Reporting of Patient-Relevant Clinical Trial Outcomes: Comparison of Unpublished Clinical Study Reports with Publicly Available Data
- (2013) Beate Wieseler et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience
- (2012) Peter Doshi et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review
- (2010) Natalie McGauran et al. Trials
- Possible harms of oseltamivir—a call for urgent action
- (2009) Tom Jefferson et al. LANCET
- Discontinuation due to adverse events in randomized trials of orlistat, sibutramine and rimonabant: a meta-analysis
- (2009) K. Johansson et al. Obesity Reviews
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search