Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals
Authors
Keywords
-
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Online
2019-04-29
DOI
10.1161/circoutcomes.118.005260
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology: review of adherence to the CONSORT statement
- (2018) Yu Qing Huang et al. Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
- Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review
- (2017) Seung Yeon Song et al. PLoS One
- Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts
- (2017) Akira Kuriyama et al. Trials
- Characteristics of funding of clinical trials: cross-sectional survey and proposed guidance
- (2017) Maram B Hakoum et al. BMJ Open
- Primary outcomes reporting in trials of paediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
- (2017) Samaneh Khanpour Ardestani et al. BMJ Open
- Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs
- (2017) M Lancee et al. Translational Psychiatry
- Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis
- (2016) Meredith Hays et al. BMJ Open
- The Primary Outcome Measure and Its Importance in Clinical Trials
- (2015) Chittaranjan Andrade JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
- Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials in Otorhinolaryngologic Literature – Adherence to the CONSORT Statement
- (2015) Jeroen P. M. Peters et al. PLoS One
- Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways?
- (2014) Qi Cui et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension
- (2013) Alex Hodkinson et al. BMJ Open
- Discordance Between Conclusions Stated in the Abstract and Conclusions in the Article: Analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Systemic Therapy in Lung Cancer
- (2012) Abdullah K. Altwairgi et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals
- (2012) Saurav Ghimire et al. Trials
- The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement
- (2012) Victoria Borg Debono et al. BMC Anesthesiology
- Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
- (2012) S. Hopewell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Primary outcome in a randomized controlled trial: A critical issue
- (2011) PankajK Garg et al. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- (2010) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine
- (2010) Ling Wang et al. Trials
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- (2010) Kenneth F Schulz et al. Trials
- Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals
- (2008) Lin Xu et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals
- (2008) Otavio Berwanger et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
- (2008) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2008) Sally Hopewell et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started