Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review
Authors
Keywords
Mental health and psychiatry, Randomized controlled trials, General medical journals, Bibliometrics, Linear regression analysis, Scientific publishing, Diagnostic medicine, Neuropsychological testing
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages e0187807
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2017-11-09
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0187807
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: A systematic review
- (2014) Lawrence Mbuagbaw et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for Abstract guidelines
- (2014) Saurav Ghimire et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways?
- (2014) Qi Cui et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- The quality of reporting of phase II and III trials for new antipsychotics: a systematic review
- (2014) M. X. Patel et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
- How Psychiatry Journals Support the Unbiased Translation of Clinical Research. A Cross-Sectional Study of Editorial Policies
- (2013) Hannes Knüppel et al. PLoS One
- Reporting Quality of Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Dental Specialty Journals
- (2013) Jadbinder Seehra et al. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
- Assessing the Reporting Quality in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Leading Journals of Oral Implantology
- (2013) Juliana Kiriakou et al. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
- Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011
- (2012) Padhraig S. Fleming et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
- Quality of Reporting of Modern Randomized Controlled Trials in Medical Oncology: A Systematic Review
- (2012) J. Peron et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals
- (2012) Saurav Ghimire et al. Trials
- The impact of the CONSORT statement on reporting of randomized clinical trials in psychiatry
- (2008) Changsu Han et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Endocrinology Literature
- (2008) Lorena P. Rios et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
- CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts
- (2008) Sally Hopewell et al. LANCET
- CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2008) Sally Hopewell et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now