Discordance Between Conclusions Stated in the Abstract and Conclusions in the Article: Analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Systemic Therapy in Lung Cancer

Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes

(2010) Isabelle Boutron   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine

(2010) Ling Wang et al.   Trials

Presentation of Nonfinal Results of Randomized Controlled Trials at Major Oncology Meetings

(2009) Christopher M. Booth et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Factors Associated with Results and Conclusions of Trials of Thiazolidinediones

(2009) Gail Rattinger et al.   PLoS One

Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm

(2008) Enrique Bernal-Delgado et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals

(2008) Otavio Berwanger et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Evolution of the Randomized Controlled Trial in Oncology Over Three Decades

(2008) Christopher M. Booth et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Consistency of Phase III Clinical Trial Abstracts Presented at an Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Compared With Their Subsequent Full-Text Publications

(2008) Vincent C. Tam et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration

(2008) Sally Hopewell et al.   PLOS MEDICINE