A surge ofp-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A surge ofp-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PeerJ
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages e733
Publisher
PeerJ
Online
2015-01-22
DOI
10.7717/peerj.733
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
- (2014) An-Wen Chan et al. LANCET
- Publication Bias in Psychology: A Diagnosis Based on the Correlation between Effect Size and Sample Size
- (2014) Anton Kühberger et al. PLoS One
- Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research
- (2014) M. B. Nuijten et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
- (2014) A. Franco et al. SCIENCE
- Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
- (2014) John P.A. Ioannidis et al. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature
- (2013) L. R. Jager et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and applications to top medical journals by Jager and Leek
- (2013) Y. Benjamini et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature
- (2013) S. N. Goodman BIOSTATISTICS
- Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false
- (2013) J. P. A. Ioannidis BIOSTATISTICS
- Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
- (2013) Gregory Francis JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
- (2013) D. Fanelli et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The Life of p: “Just Significant” Results are on the Rise
- (2013) Nathan C. Leggett et al. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study
- (2013) Joost C. F. de Winter et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome?
- (2012) Ridha Joober et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE
- Replication studies: Bad copy
- (2012) Ed Yong NATURE
- Inappropriate Fiddling with Statistical Analyses to Obtain a Desirable P-value: Tests to Detect its Presence in Published Literature
- (2012) Gary L. Gadbury et al. PLoS One
- A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05
- (2012) E.J. Masicampo et al. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Publication Bias in Neuroimaging Research: Implications for Meta-Analyses
- (2011) Robin G. Jennings et al. NEUROINFORMATICS
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes
- (2010) Isabelle Boutron JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Fighting Publication Bias: Introducing the Negative Results Section
- (2010) Ulrich Dirnagl et al. JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
- Hints of hidden heritability in GWAS
- (2010) Greg Gibson NATURE GENETICS
- “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books
- (2010) J.-B. Michel et al. SCIENCE
- Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases
- (2010) Marco Pautasso SCIENTOMETRICS
- The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index
- (2010) Peder Olesen Larsen et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Calibration of credibility of agnostic genome-wide associations
- (2008) John P.A. Ioannidis AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART B-NEUROPSYCHIATRIC GENETICS
- Google Scholar revisited
- (2008) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
- (2008) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system
- (2008) Loet Leydesdorff et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
- (2008) Neal S Young et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: A qualitative systematic review
- (2007) Sergio Sismondo Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes
- (2007) Gerta Rücker et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now