A surge ofp-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)
出版年份 2015 全文链接
标题
A surge ofp-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)
作者
关键词
-
出版物
PeerJ
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages e733
出版商
PeerJ
发表日期
2015-01-22
DOI
10.7717/peerj.733
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
- (2014) An-Wen Chan et al. LANCET
- Publication Bias in Psychology: A Diagnosis Based on the Correlation between Effect Size and Sample Size
- (2014) Anton Kühberger et al. PLoS One
- Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research
- (2014) M. B. Nuijten et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
- (2014) A. Franco et al. SCIENCE
- Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
- (2014) John P.A. Ioannidis et al. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature
- (2013) L. R. Jager et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and applications to top medical journals by Jager and Leek
- (2013) Y. Benjamini et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature
- (2013) S. N. Goodman BIOSTATISTICS
- Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false
- (2013) J. P. A. Ioannidis BIOSTATISTICS
- Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
- (2013) Gregory Francis JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
- (2013) D. Fanelli et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The Life of p: “Just Significant” Results are on the Rise
- (2013) Nathan C. Leggett et al. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study
- (2013) Joost C. F. de Winter et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome?
- (2012) Ridha Joober et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE
- Replication studies: Bad copy
- (2012) Ed Yong NATURE
- Inappropriate Fiddling with Statistical Analyses to Obtain a Desirable P-value: Tests to Detect its Presence in Published Literature
- (2012) Gary L. Gadbury et al. PLoS One
- A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05
- (2012) E.J. Masicampo et al. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Publication Bias in Neuroimaging Research: Implications for Meta-Analyses
- (2011) Robin G. Jennings et al. NEUROINFORMATICS
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes
- (2010) Isabelle Boutron JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Fighting Publication Bias: Introducing the Negative Results Section
- (2010) Ulrich Dirnagl et al. JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
- Hints of hidden heritability in GWAS
- (2010) Greg Gibson NATURE GENETICS
- “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books
- (2010) J.-B. Michel et al. SCIENCE
- Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases
- (2010) Marco Pautasso SCIENTOMETRICS
- The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index
- (2010) Peder Olesen Larsen et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Calibration of credibility of agnostic genome-wide associations
- (2008) John P.A. Ioannidis AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART B-NEUROPSYCHIATRIC GENETICS
- Google Scholar revisited
- (2008) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
- (2008) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system
- (2008) Loet Leydesdorff et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
- (2008) Neal S Young et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: A qualitative systematic review
- (2007) Sergio Sismondo Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes
- (2007) Gerta Rücker et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started