4.5 Review

The lungs as anatomical reservoirs of HIV infection

Journal

REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 35-54

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.1772

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network (CTN) Postdoctoral Fellowship Award
  2. Canadian Association for AIDS Research (CANFAR)/CTN Postdoctoral Fellowship Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Failure of antiretroviral therapy to eradicate HIV, even in individuals who suppress the virus to undetectable levels, is a consequence of persistent infection in latently infected cells and within anatomical reservoirs. Support for the notion that the lungs are distinct anatomical reservoirs of HIV comes from a spectrum of studies that have documented different levels of HIV within the lungs compared with the peripheral blood. Different HIV variants have also been found within these two compartments, including variants with distinct antiretroviral resistance mutations. Given that macrophages are long-lived cellular reservoirs of HIV because of their resistance to apoptosis, HIV can persist for prolonged periods within alveolar macrophages that are abundant within the lungs. Furthermore, the large number of cells in close proximity within the lungs provides fertile grounds for cell-to-cell spread of HIV. Distinct immunological pressures in the lungs compared with the peripheral blood likely account for differences in HIV levels within these two compartments in addition to the finding of different variants within these regions. Furthermore, coinfections and tobacco may serve as local stimuli to induce further HIV replication within the lungs. Herein, we review the evidence supporting the notion that lungs are important reservoirs of HIV infection, and we discuss various factors influencing HIV burden within these reservoirs. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available