Journal Title
Laser & Photonics Reviews

LASER PHOTONICS REV

ISSN / eISSN
1863-8880 / 1863-8899
Aims and Scope
Laser & Photonics Reviews publishes top-quality review articles, original papers and letters covering the current range of photonics and laser physics, both theoretical and experimental, from recent breakthrough research to specific developments and novel applications.

Main Areas of Interest: Photonic Materials; Metamaterials; Nanophotonics; Ultrafast Photonics; Plasmonics; Quantum Photonics - Quantum Science & Technology; Silicon Photonics; Light-Matter Interaction; Synthetic Dimension; Topological Photonics; Semiconductor Photonics; Photonics of LEDs, Solar Cells and Detectors; Fibre Lasers & Fibre Optics; Sub-Wavelength Photonics; Optical Antennas; Photonics of Artificial Materials; Micro/ Nano Cavities; Laser Cooling and Ultracold Gases; Optofluidics; Optomechanics; Laser Metrology and Spectroscopy; Transformation Optics; Nanolasers; Holography; Biophotonics & Biomedical Optics; Nonlinear Optics; Optical Absorbers; Optical Coatings; Photonic Crystals; Optical Imaging; Optics in Telecommunication.
Subject Area

OPTICS

PHYSICS, APPLIED

PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER

CiteScore
14.90 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Physics and Astronomy - Condensed Matter Physics Q1 #14/423
Physics and Astronomy - Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics Q1 #11/211
Physics and Astronomy - Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials Q1 #20/271
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
OPTICS - SCIE Q1
PHYSICS, APPLIED - SCIE Q1
PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER - SCIE Q1
H-index
94
Country/Area of Publication
GERMANY
Publisher
Wiley-VCH Verlag
Publication Frequency
Bimonthly
Year Publication Started
2007
Annual Article Volume
301
Open Access
NO
Contact
WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH, PO BOX 10 11 61, WEINHEIM, GERMANY, D-69451
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
I received a work related to luminescent materials and I am very happy, so I would like to share it.

20230404: Submission
20230405: Under review
20230608: Received reviewer comments
20230702: Around 5:30 PM, sent revised manuscript
20230703: Morning, resubmitted for review
20230703: Afternoon, accepted

The submission process was indeed slow. It took two months for the first round of reviewer comments to come back. There were two reviewers, and they gave one month to make revisions. One reviewer agreed to accept with minimal comments, while the other reviewer suggested major revisions and provided strict feedback, requiring additional experiments. In the final response to the comments, I felt that I satisfactorily addressed the reviewer's concerns. I am grateful to my supervisor for encouraging me to calmly supplement the experiments when facing a battle with the reviewers. I also appreciate my supervisor for allowing me to publish work primarily conducted during my doctoral period under the affiliation of my current workplace. Lastly, I am thankful to my supervisor for continuing to guide me even after graduation. (*^▽^*)
2023-07-03
More than half a year has passed without submission. During this time, an editorial note would come back every two months or so, repeatedly questioning a small portion of the simulation results in the article, doubting that they were not self-made. We responded seriously with all the simulation parameters and model explanations, but in the end, the article was rejected on the grounds of not convincing the editor. Although I have become accustomed to rejection and no longer feel too sad about it, it is still the first time I have encountered such an unreliable and irresponsible journal. For over half a year, there has been no substantial feedback or assistance on the content of the article. They questioned without specifying the issues, only asking for more detailed data. We have already provided the software and model parameters, but they still did not believe it. It's purely a waste of time. Maybe I just had bad luck and didn't encounter a good editor, but this is also the last time I will submit to LPR. I have blacklisted them. This is only for everyone's reference when submitting articles.
2023-03-09

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started