SCI豌豆射手 2023-08-08

How long will it take to see results? Is everything going smoothly? Mine has just been under review for a week, and AFM suggested a transfer.

坏坏大侠 2023-07-03

I received a work related to luminescent materials and I am very happy, so I would like to share it.

20230404: Submission
20230405: Under review
20230608: Received reviewer comments
20230702: Around 5:30 PM, sent revised manuscript
20230703: Morning, resubmitted for review
20230703: Afternoon, accepted

The submission process was indeed slow. It took two months for the first round of reviewer comments to come back. There were two reviewers, and they gave one month to make revisions. One reviewer agreed to accept with minimal comments, while the other reviewer suggested major revisions and provided strict feedback, requiring additional experiments. In the final response to the comments, I felt that I satisfactorily addressed the reviewer's concerns. I am grateful to my supervisor for encouraging me to calmly supplement the experiments when facing a battle with the reviewers. I also appreciate my supervisor for allowing me to publish work primarily conducted during my doctoral period under the affiliation of my current workplace. Lastly, I am thankful to my supervisor for continuing to guide me even after graduation. (*^▽^*)

w1ww1 2023-07-01

Old-established optical TOP one district journal, high international recognition.

兰斯 2023-06-27

I have also been under review for 2 months, and they don't reply to my reminder emails. I really don't understand why they can be so unreliable. It's outrageous.

captZ 2023-06-09

Is there a submission process? I submitted it in the evening and it was with the editor that same night. How long after your manuscript is under review? 0608 With Editor.

艾萨客 2023-05-29

I have been under review for four months and still no progress. I am considering sending a reminder because this journal is so slow. It seems like many people have the same issue.

wangxidong9999 2023-05-26

It has been 2 months now without any progress. They don't respond to reminders either. Does anyone know why it is so slow?

bicsma 2023-05-23

Recently, the quality of the articles published in LPR has been getting worse.

scqzzz 2023-05-19

Has the submission been sent for external review after being "Under Review" for two days? The journal has been categorized as "small," and the small editor has recommended forwarding it to LPR.

jewifj32jr2r3 2023-04-25

Ask a question, are you doing minor repairs or major repairs, and will there be a review after the repairs are done?

艾萨客 2023-03-28

Thank you, but there are still no results after two months. I am worried that there is no external review. The review process is also too long.

黑小威 2023-03-21

We are also shown as "under review," but actually there is no external review. Unsure if your situation is the same now, or perhaps yours has already been submitted for review.

艾萨客 2023-03-09

May I ask if my status is still "under review" after a month and a half? Was it the same for you at that time? Does this status mean that it hasn't been reviewed yet, just like yours? I am considering whether to send a message to the editorial department.

黑小威 2023-03-09

More than half a year has passed without submission. During this time, an editorial note would come back every two months or so, repeatedly questioning a small portion of the simulation results in the article, doubting that they were not self-made. We responded seriously with all the simulation parameters and model explanations, but in the end, the article was rejected on the grounds of not convincing the editor. Although I have become accustomed to rejection and no longer feel too sad about it, it is still the first time I have encountered such an unreliable and irresponsible journal. For over half a year, there has been no substantial feedback or assistance on the content of the article. They questioned without specifying the issues, only asking for more detailed data. We have already provided the software and model parameters, but they still did not believe it. It's purely a waste of time. Maybe I just had bad luck and didn't encounter a good editor, but this is also the last time I will submit to LPR. I have blacklisted them. This is only for everyone's reference when submitting articles.

wlz777 2023-02-11

The editor is very responsible, and it took half a year and three rounds of revisions. The reviewer's questions were very helpful in improving the article.

再见孙悟空 2022-12-05

Is there a big format change when switching from Light to LPR?

柠檬柠檬 2022-10-11

What will the status be if it is submitted for review?

MWH 2022-10-02

The next day, it was submitted for review.

黑小威 2022-10-01

Excuse me, may I ask how long does it take to submit for review after "with editor"?

MWH 2022-10-01

Translating from Chinese (Simplified) to English:

"From light to LPR, the reviewers hardly put up any resistance. Made a few minor revisions and got accepted. It's just that the editor is slow, took three weeks to respond."

haoyi 2022-09-23

The article has undergone multiple revisions and reworks, taking about 10 months. The comments from multiple reviewers have significantly enhanced this work, and it is hoped that some improvements can be made in terms of shortening the review cycle.

山上有老虎 2022-09-05

I have also been investing for more than a week, but it still shows the status as "submitted", very puzzling.

guangying 2022-09-01

How long does it take for the review process of this journal? What are the different stages? Can someone share their experience?

爱不会绝迹622848 2022-04-21

From submission to major revisions to acceptance, it took exactly two months. The reviewers' comments were very constructive, and I hope the journal continues to improve!

仲卿 2021-09-16

Publishing a high-impact optical top-tier journal with an impact factor above 10 for the first time, I would like to express my gratitude to the four reviewers for their valuable feedback on the quality of the article.

Qiang Friedrich 2021-04-20

Wrote a comprehensive review of two-dimensional LED, submitted at the end of October 2020, received rejection reply by the end of December 2020. Resubmitted after making modifications in the same month, received minor revision comments in February 2021. Modified and sent back after one day, received acceptance two days later. Early access publication in mid-April 2021.