IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification
IEEE T TRANSP ELECTR
ISSN / eISSN
2332-7782 / 2332-7782
Aims and Scope
IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification is focused on components, sub-systems, systems, standards, and grid interface technologies related to power and energy conversion, propulsion, and actuation for all types of electrified vehicles including on-road, off-road, off-highway, and rail vehicles, airplanes, and ships.
Subject Area
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.70
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Engineering - Automotive Engineering | Q1 | #8/115 |
Engineering - Electrical and Electronic Engineering | Q1 | #63/738 |
Engineering - Energy Engineering and Power Technology | Q1 | #27/252 |
Engineering - Transportation | Q1 | #15/128 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | Quartile |
---|---|
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC - SCIE | Q1 |
TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY - SCIE | Q1 |
Country/Area of Publication
United States
Publisher
IEEE
Annual Article Volume
368
Open Access
NO
Contact
445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
Verified Reviews
2021.03.08 Major revision Two reviewers appreciated the innovation, but there were many unclear expressions in the article, and they provided suggestions for modification; the third reviewer stated that there was insufficient innovation and rejected the article, so the editor requested a major revision.
2021.04.15 Revised version resubmitted
2021.06.18 Rejected
There were a total of three reviewers, the first reviewer appreciated the article; the second reviewer mentioned that there were still unclear parts and provided additional suggestions for two days; the third reviewer insisted on the lack of innovation and rejected the article, resulting in its ultimate rejection.
Overall, the journal's review process was very thorough, and the feedback was very constructive. All the reviewers were industry experts. Although the article was rejected, it made me feel that the journal is worth submitting to and provides great help for academic writing. I will definitely submit to this journal again when writing another article. I wish to have success with other journal submissions in the future.
2021.11.02: Submitted
2021.12.13: Major Revision
2022.03.04: Revised submission
2022.04.15: Awaiting Associate Editor recommendation
2022.05.01: Awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision
2022.05.03: Accepted.
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started