Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: Is passive participation an ethical problem?
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: Is passive participation an ethical problem?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 897-902
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-01-09
DOI
10.1038/ejhg.2012.282
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets
- (2012) Susan M. Wolf et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus
- (2012) Zubin Master et al. NATURE METHODS
- From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research
- (2012) Jane Kaye et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- Consent and Research Governance in Biobanks: Evidence from Focus Groups with Medical Researchers
- (2012) E.A. Whitley et al. Public Health Genomics
- Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy
- (2012) R. Moynihan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Power to the people: a wiki-governance model for biobanks
- (2012) Edward S Dove et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- Genomics really gets personal: How exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research
- (2011) Holly K. Tabor et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- In Defense of Broad Consent
- (2011) GERT HELGESSON CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS
- Ethical Endgames: Broad Consent for Narrow Interests; Open Consent for Closed Minds
- (2011) JAN REINERT KARLSEN et al. CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS
- Active choice but not too active: Public perspectives on biobank consent models
- (2011) Christian M. Simon et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance
- (2011) Jane Kaye HUMAN GENETICS
- Treat donors as partners in biobank research
- (2011) Krishanu Saha et al. NATURE
- You never call, you never write: why return of ‘omic’ results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative
- (2011) Misha Angrist Personalized Medicine
- Biobanks--When is Re-consent Necessary?
- (2011) K. S. Steinsbekk et al. Public Health Ethics
- Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent?
- (2011) M. Sheehan Public Health Ethics
- Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe
- (2010) Petter Bae Brandtzæg et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES
- Broadening consent--and diluting ethics?
- (2009) B Hofmann JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- “Broad” consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose
- (2009) Carlo Petrini SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started