- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How good is research really?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EMBO REPORTS
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 226-230
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2013-02-12
DOI
10.1038/embor.2013.9
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them
- (2012) Michael Schreiber JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Accounting for the uncertainty in the evaluation of percentile ranks
- (2012) Loet Leydesdorff JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation
- (2012) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Modesty-index
- (2012) Marek Kosmulski Journal of Informetrics
- The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011
- (2012) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The advantage of the use of samples in evaluative bibliometric studies
- (2012) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits
- (2012) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The inconsistency of the h-index
- (2011) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator
- (2011) Ronald Rousseau JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
- (2011) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the predictive validity of editorial decisions: do the editors of a high profile journal select manuscripts that are highly cited after publication?
- (2011) Lutz Bornmann et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics
- (2011) Lutz Bornmann et al. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
- Quality Versus Quantity: Assessing Individual Research Performance
- (2011) J.-A. Sahel Science Translational Medicine
- The success-index: an alternative approach to the h-index for evaluating an individual’s research output
- (2011) Fiorenzo Franceschini et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Successful papers: A new idea in evaluation of scientific output
- (2011) Marek Kosmulski Journal of Informetrics
- A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants
- (2011) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- How to improve the use of metrics
- (2010) NATURE
- Metrics: journal's impact factor skewed by a single paper
- (2010) Jordan D. Dimitrov et al. NATURE
- Metrics: A profusion of measures
- (2010) Richard Van Noorden NATURE
- The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?
- (2008) Lutz Bornmann et al. EMBO REPORTS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started