标题
How good is research really?
作者
关键词
-
出版物
EMBO REPORTS
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 226-230
出版商
Wiley
发表日期
2013-02-12
DOI
10.1038/embor.2013.9
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them
- (2012) Michael Schreiber JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Accounting for the uncertainty in the evaluation of percentile ranks
- (2012) Loet Leydesdorff JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation
- (2012) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Modesty-index
- (2012) Marek Kosmulski Journal of Informetrics
- The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011
- (2012) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The advantage of the use of samples in evaluative bibliometric studies
- (2012) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits
- (2012) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The inconsistency of the h-index
- (2011) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator
- (2011) Ronald Rousseau JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
- (2011) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the predictive validity of editorial decisions: do the editors of a high profile journal select manuscripts that are highly cited after publication?
- (2011) Lutz Bornmann et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics
- (2011) Lutz Bornmann et al. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
- Quality Versus Quantity: Assessing Individual Research Performance
- (2011) J.-A. Sahel Science Translational Medicine
- The success-index: an alternative approach to the h-index for evaluating an individual’s research output
- (2011) Fiorenzo Franceschini et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Successful papers: A new idea in evaluation of scientific output
- (2011) Marek Kosmulski Journal of Informetrics
- A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants
- (2011) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- How to improve the use of metrics
- (2010) NATURE
- Metrics: journal's impact factor skewed by a single paper
- (2010) Jordan D. Dimitrov et al. NATURE
- Metrics: A profusion of measures
- (2010) Richard Van Noorden NATURE
- The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?
- (2008) Lutz Bornmann et al. EMBO REPORTS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now