Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies
Authors
Keywords
Animal studies, Clinical research design, Probiotics, Pancreatitis, Systematic reviews, Publication ethics, Meta-analysis, Drug research and development
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages e0187271
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2018-01-12
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0187271
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Determinants of the Efficacy of Cardiac Ischemic Preconditioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies
- (2015) Kimberley E. Wever et al. PLoS One
- SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies
- (2014) Carlijn R Hooijmans et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- All preclinical trials should be registered in advance in an online registry
- (2014) Sanne J. Jansen of Lorkeers et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- Meta-Analyses of Animal Studies: An Introduction of a Valuable Instrument to Further Improve Healthcare
- (2014) C. R. Hooijmans et al. ILAR JOURNAL
- Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies: Why Perform Them and How to Appraise Them Critically
- (2014) Emily S Sena et al. JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
- Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies; Missing Link in Translational Research?
- (2014) Judith van Luijk et al. PLoS One
- Implementing Systematic Review at the National Toxicology Program: Status and Next Steps
- (2013) Linda S. Birnbaum et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength
- (2013) Jeffrey C. Andrews et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide
- (2013) H.M. Vesterinen et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
- Threats to Validity in the Design and Conduct of Preclinical Efficacy Studies: A Systematic Review of Guidelines for In Vivo Animal Experiments
- (2013) Valerie C. Henderson et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Progress in Using Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies to Improve Translational Research
- (2013) C. R. Hooijmans et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes
- (2012) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes
- (2012) Gordon Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes
- (2012) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Research: A Survey on Magnitude, Drivers, Consequences and Potential Solutions
- (2012) Gerben ter Riet et al. PLoS One
- The Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Experimental Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2012) Carlijn R. Hooijmans et al. PLoS One
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence
- (2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency
- (2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
- (2011) Howard Balshem et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness
- (2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias
- (2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
- (2011) Gordon Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
- (2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
- (2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A search filter for increasing the retrieval of animal studies in Embase
- (2011) Rob B M de Vries et al. LABORATORY ANIMALS
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: Publication bias in laboratory animal experiments
- (2011) D A Korevaar et al. LABORATORY ANIMALS
- A step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies
- (2011) Marlies Leenaars et al. LABORATORY ANIMALS
- GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
- (2010) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Enhancing search efficiency by means of a search filter for finding all studies on animal experimentation in PubMed
- (2010) Carlijn R Hooijmans et al. LABORATORY ANIMALS
- Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy
- (2010) Emily S. Sena et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
- (2010) Carol Kilkenny et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals
- (2009) Carol Kilkenny et al. PLoS One
- DHA and cholesterol containing diets influence Alzheimer-like pathology, cognition and cerebral vasculature in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice
- (2008) C.R. Hooijmans et al. NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now