4.2 Review

Regulation of innate and adaptive antitumor immunity by IAP antagonists

Journal

IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages 787-796

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/imt-2017-0185

Keywords

c-IAP1/c-IAP2; IAP antagonists; inhibitor of apoptosis proteins; SMAC mimetics; tumor immunotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Novartis Program in Drug Discovery
  3. Melanoma Research Alliance
  4. Pew Foundation
  5. AGA Research Scholars Award
  6. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Mentored Clinical Scientist Development Award [1K08DK114563-01]
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [K08DK114563] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inhibition of the T-cell co-inhibitory checkpoint receptors or their ligands CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 using monoclonal antibodies has proven to be highly effective against many cancers. Yet many cancers remain resistant to checkpoint blockade, and durable remissions occur in only a minority of patients. Novel approaches to enhancing antitumor responses are thus necessary in order to expand the reach of these treatments. The inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) protein family comprises a diverse group of proteins, many of which have immunoregulatory roles. Small molecule IAP antagonists have been developed and are undergoing early phase clinical testing. These drugs were initially developed to promote tumor cell apoptosis; however, a considerable body of work now indicates that IAP antagonists induce antitumor activity through modulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Primarily through inhibition of cellular (c)-IAP1 and c-IAP2, IAP antagonists can activate alternative NF-kappa B signaling, promoting B-cell survival, activation of dendritic cells and delivering a broad co-stimulatory signal to T cells. At the same time, IAP antagonists can promote tumor cell intrinsic sensitization to innate immune signals, and enhance tumor cell killing by inflammatory cytokines and phagocytic macrophages. These drugs thus represent an attractive investigational approach to immunotherapy, providing a positive signaling counterpart to the relief of signal inhibition conferred by checkpoint blockade.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
Review Immunology

Imaging findings can't mean everything in the era of immunotherapy: a case report and literature review

Xiangye Zhao, Kewei Ma, Xiaobo Ma, Xu Wang, Chao Sun, Shi Qiu, Ye Guo, Zhiguang Yang, Yunpeng Liu, Yinghui Xu

Summary: Immunotherapy may lead to pseudoprogression, where tumors initially grow but shrink with continued treatment. This article reports a case of pseudoprogression in a lung cancer patient receiving immunotherapy, and reviews the mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and prognostic indicators of pseudoprogression.

IMMUNOTHERAPY (2024)

Article Immunology

Toripalimab and fruquintinib therapy for colorectal cancer after failed multiline chemotherapies: a case report

Ling-zhijie Kong, Ying Zheng, Kaichun Li

Summary: Treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer are limited after second-line chemotherapy failure. In this case report, a 59-year-old male patient achieved remarkable response to fruquintinib and toripalimab combination therapy after multiple lines of chemotherapy failed. The patient had partial response within 3 months and complete response of pulmonary masses within 12 months. The combination of fruquintinib and PD-1 inhibitors improves the prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer, with a progression-free survival of over 17 months.

IMMUNOTHERAPY (2024)