On the relative value of data resampling approaches for software defect prediction
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
On the relative value of data resampling approaches for software defect prediction
Authors
Keywords
Software defect prediction, Imbalanced data, Data resampling approaches, Class imbalance, Empirical study
Journal
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-06-21
DOI
10.1007/s10664-018-9633-6
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Software defect prediction using ensemble learning on selected features
- (2015) Issam H. Laradji et al. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
- Two-Stage Cost-Sensitive Learning for Software Defect Prediction
- (2014) Mingxia Liu et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY
- Which process metrics can significantly improve defect prediction models? An empirical study
- (2014) Lech Madeyski et al. SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL
- Using Class Imbalance Learning for Software Defect Prediction
- (2013) Shuo Wang et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY
- Active learning and effort estimation: Finding the essential content of software effort estimation data
- (2013) Ekrem Kocaguneli et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Software fault prediction metrics: A systematic literature review
- (2013) Danijel Radjenović et al. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
- MWMOTE--Majority Weighted Minority Oversampling Technique for Imbalanced Data Set Learning
- (2012) Sukarna Barua et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING
- Using Coding-Based Ensemble Learning to Improve Software Defect Prediction
- (2012) Zhongbin Sun et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND RE
- An investigation on the feasibility of cross-project defect prediction
- (2011) Zhimin He et al. Automated Software Engineering
- Evaluating defect prediction approaches: a benchmark and an extensive comparison
- (2011) Marco D’Ambros et al. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Exploiting the Essential Assumptions of Analogy-Based Effort Estimation
- (2011) E. Kocaguneli et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Prediction Performance in Software Engineering
- (2011) T. Hall et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- On the effectiveness of preprocessing methods when dealing with different levels of class imbalance
- (2011) V. García et al. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
- Defect prediction from static code features: current results, limitations, new approaches
- (2010) Tim Menzies et al. Automated Software Engineering
- Cost-sensitive boosting neural networks for software defect prediction
- (2009) Jun Zheng EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
- Learning from Imbalanced Data
- (2009) Haibo He et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING
- Evolutionary Sampling and Software Quality Modeling of High-Assurance Systems
- (2009) D.J. Drown et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS
- RUSBoost: A Hybrid Approach to Alleviating Class Imbalance
- (2009) Chris Seiffert et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS
- A systematic and comprehensive investigation of methods to build and evaluate fault prediction models
- (2009) Erik Arisholm et al. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE
- Techniques for evaluating fault prediction models
- (2008) Yue Jiang et al. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Benchmarking Classification Models for Software Defect Prediction: A Proposed Framework and Novel Findings
- (2008) S. Lessmann et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- SVMs Modeling for Highly Imbalanced Classification
- (2008) Yuchun Tang et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started