4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Investigation on biochemical compositional changes during the microbial fermentation process of Fu brick tea by LC-MS based metabolomics

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages 176-184

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.045

Keywords

Fu brick tea; Microbial fermentation process; Non-targeted LC-MS; Biochemical compositional changes

Funding

  1. Major Program of Acquisition of Academy Lead Talent and Team in Anhui Province
  2. Anhui Agricultural University Talents Foundation [YJ2011-06]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1101]
  4. Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System in Tea Industry of Chinese Ministry of Agriculture [nycytx-26]
  5. Biotechnology Platform Construction Foundation of Anhui Province [13Z03012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fu brick tea (FBT) is a unique post-fermented tea product which is fermented with fungi during the manufacturing process. In this study, we investigated the biochemical compositional changes occurring during the microbial fermentation process (MFP) of FBT based on non-targeted LC-MS, which was a comprehensive and unbiased methodology. Our data analysis took a two-phase approach: (1) comparison of FBT with other tea products using PCA analysis to exhibit the characteristic effect of MFP on the formation of Fu brick tea and (2) comparison of tea samples throughout the MFP of FBT to elucidate the possible key metabolic pathways produced by the fungi. Non-targeted LC-MS analysis clearly distinguished FBT with other tea samples and highlighted some interesting metabolic pathways during the MFP including B ring fission catechin. Our study demonstrated that those fungi had a significant influence on the biochemical profiles in the FBT and consequently contributed to its unique quality. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available