The Usefulness of Systematic Reviews of Animal Experiments for the Design of Preclinical and Clinical Studies
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The Usefulness of Systematic Reviews of Animal Experiments for the Design of Preclinical and Clinical Studies
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ILAR JOURNAL
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 427-437
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2014-12-25
DOI
10.1093/ilar/ilu043
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Evidence-based toxicology – the toolbox of validation for the 21st century?
- (2016) Thomas Hartung ALTEX-Alternatives to Animal Experimentation
- SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies
- (2014) Carlijn R Hooijmans et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies: Why Perform Them and How to Appraise Them Critically
- (2014) Emily S Sena et al. JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
- Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
- (2014) John P A Ioannidis et al. LANCET
- Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies; Missing Link in Translational Research?
- (2014) Judith van Luijk et al. PLoS One
- A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing
- (2014) David Basketter ALTEX-Alternatives to Animal Experimentation
- Evidence-based toxicology for the 21st century: Opportunities and challenges
- (2014) Martin Stephens ALTEX-Alternatives to Animal Experimentation
- Animal models of human disease: Challenges in enabling translation
- (2013) Paul McGonigle et al. BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of temozolomide in animal models of glioma: was clinical efficacy predicted?
- (2013) T C Hirst et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide
- (2013) H.M. Vesterinen et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
- Letter to the Editor
- (2013) Rob B M de Vries et al. LABORATORY ANIMALS
- Endothelium-Dependent Relaxation and Angiotensin II Sensitivity in Experimental Preeclampsia
- (2013) Anne Marijn van der Graaf et al. PLoS One
- Threats to Validity in the Design and Conduct of Preclinical Efficacy Studies: A Systematic Review of Guidelines for In Vivo Animal Experiments
- (2013) Valerie C. Henderson et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Progress in Using Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies to Improve Translational Research
- (2013) C. R. Hooijmans et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Adaptive changes of mesenteric arteries in pregnancy: a meta-analysis
- (2012) Joris van Drongelen et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY
- Should preclinical studies be registered?
- (2012) Jonathan Kimmelman et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Ischemic Preconditioning in the Animal Kidney, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2012) Kimberley E. Wever et al. PLoS One
- Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Research: A Survey on Magnitude, Drivers, Consequences and Potential Solutions
- (2012) Gerben ter Riet et al. PLoS One
- The Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Experimental Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2012) Carlijn R. Hooijmans et al. PLoS One
- Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010
- (2011) Sarah Adler et al. ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY
- Animal models in urinary diversion
- (2011) Alexander Roosen et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- A search filter for increasing the retrieval of animal studies in Embase
- (2011) Rob B M de Vries et al. LABORATORY ANIMALS
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: Publication bias in laboratory animal experiments
- (2011) D A Korevaar et al. LABORATORY ANIMALS
- A step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies
- (2011) Marlies Leenaars et al. LABORATORY ANIMALS
- Feasibility study of the zebrafish assay as an alternative method to screen for developmental toxicity and embryotoxicity using a training set of 27 compounds
- (2011) Ingrid W.T. Selderslaghs et al. REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
- Cisplatin-induced emesis: systematic review and meta-analysis of the ferret model and the effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists
- (2010) N. Percie du Sert et al. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
- Factors Affecting the Apparent Efficacy and Safety of Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Thrombotic Occlusion Models of Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2010) Emily S Sena et al. JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
- Therapeutic Hypothermia for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Ready to Start Large Randomized Trials?
- (2010) H Bart van der Worp et al. JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
- Enhancing search efficiency by means of a search filter for finding all studies on animal experimentation in PubMed
- (2010) Carlijn R Hooijmans et al. LABORATORY ANIMALS
- Improving the translational hit of experimental treatments in multiple sclerosis
- (2010) Hanna M Vesterinen et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy
- (2010) Emily S. Sena et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies?
- (2010) H. Bart van der Worp et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals
- (2009) Carol Kilkenny et al. PLoS One
- Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- (2008) Marc GH Besselink et al. LANCET
- Preclinical animal models in single site cartilage defect testing: a systematic review
- (2008) B.J. Ahern et al. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
- Evidence for the Efficacy of NXY-059 in Experimental Focal Cerebral Ischaemia Is Confounded by Study Quality
- (2008) Malcolm R. Macleod et al. STROKE
- Empirical Evidence of Bias in the Design of Experimental Stroke Studies
- (2008) Nicolas A. Crossley et al. STROKE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started