A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research
Authors
Keywords
Protocol, Registration, Selective reporting, Discrepancy, Inconsistency, Biased reporting, Incomplete reporting
Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-01-11
DOI
10.1186/s12874-017-0465-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Association of Trial Registration With Reporting of Primary Outcomes in Protocols and Publications
- (2017) An-Wen Chan et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy
- (2017) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol
- (2017) Guowei Li et al. BMJ Open
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions
- (2016) Jan J. Rongen et al. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
- Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish
- (2016) Paola Rosati et al. Trials
- Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
- (2015) Christopher W. Jones et al. BMC Medicine
- Comparison of noninferiority margins reported in protocols and publications showed incomplete and inconsistent reporting
- (2015) Olaf M. Dekkers et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A 5-year follow-up
- (2015) Kira E Riehm et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
- Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications
- (2015) Chun-Xiang Su et al. Trials
- Reporting Discrepancies Between the ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database and Peer-Reviewed Publications
- (2014) Daniel M. Hartung et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Publication and Reporting of Test Accuracy Studies Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2014) D. A. Korevaar et al. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
- (2014) An-Wen Chan et al. LANCET
- Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications
- (2014) B. Kasenda et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Benefits and harms in clinical trials of duloxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of clinical study reports, trial registries, and publications
- (2014) E. Maund et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials
- (2014) Kerry Dwan et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Clinical trial registries are of minimal use for identifying selective outcome and analysis reporting
- (2014) Susan L. Norris et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer
- (2013) F. E. Vera-Badillo et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trial Registry Entries and Content of Reports in Surgery Journals
- (2013) Rachel Rosenthal et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions
- (2013) Gerjon Hannink et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals
- (2013) Shane Killeen et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Cohort study of trials submitted to ethics committee identified discrepant reporting of outcomes in publications
- (2013) Shelagh Redmond et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Discrepancies between registered and published primary outcome specifications in analgesic trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations
- (2013) Shannon M. Smith et al. PAIN
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials of gastroenterology and hepatology
- (2013) Xiao-Qian Li et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Practices and impact of primary outcome adjustment in randomized controlled trials: meta-epidemiologic study
- (2013) N. Saquib et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
- (2013) A.-W. Chan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Differences in Reporting of Analyses in Internal Company Documents Versus Published Trial Reports: Comparisons in Industry-Sponsored Trials in Off-Label Uses of Gabapentin
- (2013) S. Swaroop Vedula et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Timing and Completeness of Trial Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and Published in Journals
- (2013) Carolina Riveros et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols
- (2012) Rahul Mhaskar et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review
- (2012) Helen Nankervis et al. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
- Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials: An Analysis of Efficacy Comparing the Published Literature to the US Food and Drug Administration Database
- (2012) Erick H. Turner et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- A Comparison of Subgroup Analyses in Grant Applications and Publications
- (2011) C. W. B. Boonacker et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic Review
- (2011) Benoit You et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Recognizing, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the WHO
- (2011) Kay Dickersin et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
- Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A systematic review
- (2010) Katherine Milette et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2009) Sylvain Mathieu JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Outcome Reporting in Industry-Sponsored Trials of Gabapentin for Off-Label Use
- (2009) S. Swaroop Vedula et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey
- (2009) Lorenzo P Moja et al. Trials
- Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet
- (2008) Sanaa Al-Marzouki et al. LANCET
- Bias, Spin, and Misreporting: Time for Full Access to Trial Protocols and Results
- (2008) An-Wen Chan PLOS MEDICINE
- Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation
- (2008) Kristin Rising et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started