Comparatively salient: examining the influence of preceding performances on assessors’ focus and interpretations in written assessment comments
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparatively salient: examining the influence of preceding performances on assessors’ focus and interpretations in written assessment comments
Authors
Keywords
Assessment of clinical performance, Assessor cognition, Comparative distinctiveness, Contrast effects, Mini-CEX, Rater-based assessment, Rater cognition, Rater error, Rater bias, Salience
Journal
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-07-06
DOI
10.1007/s10459-018-9841-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters’ divergent points of view
- (2016) Andrea Gingerich et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Rater cognition: review and integration of research findings
- (2016) Geneviève Gauthier et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Selecting and Simplifying: Rater Performance and Behavior When Considering Multiple Competencies
- (2016) Walter Tavares et al. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE
- Are Examiners’ Judgments in OSCE-Style Assessments Influenced by Contrast Effects?
- (2015) Peter Yeates et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Expectations, observations, and the cognitive processes that bind them: expert assessment of examinee performance
- (2015) Christina St-Onge et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Hedging to save face: a linguistic analysis of written comments on in-training evaluation reports
- (2015) Shiphra Ginsburg et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Relatively speaking: contrast effects influence assessors’ scores and narrative feedback
- (2015) Peter Yeates et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- More Consensus Than Idiosyncrasy
- (2014) Andrea Gingerich et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Seeing the ‘black box’ differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectives
- (2014) Andrea Gingerich et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- ‘You're certainly relatively competent’: assessor bias due to recent experiences
- (2013) Peter Yeates et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Seeing the same thing differently
- (2012) Peter Yeates et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Effect of Exposure to Good vs Poor Medical Trainee Performance on Attending Physician Ratings of Subsequent Performances
- (2012) Peter Yeates et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose
- (2012) C. P. M. van der Vleuten et al. MEDICAL TEACHER
- Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment
- (2012) Subha Ramani et al. MEDICAL TEACHER
- Opening the black box of clinical skills assessment via observation: a conceptual model
- (2011) Jennifer R Kogan et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Internal structure of mini-CEX scores for internal medicine residents: factor analysis and generalizability
- (2010) David A. Cook et al. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Investigation of trainee and specialist reactions to the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in anaesthesia: implications for implementation
- (2009) J.M. Weller et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
- Implementing the undergraduate mini-CEX: a tailored approach at Southampton University
- (2009) Faith Hill et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales
- (2008) James Carifio et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started