R-IDEAL: A Framework for Systematic Clinical Evaluation of Technical Innovations in Radiation Oncology
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
R-IDEAL: A Framework for Systematic Clinical Evaluation of Technical Innovations in Radiation Oncology
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Online
2017-04-04
DOI
10.3389/fonc.2017.00059
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices
- (2016) Art Sedrakyan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices
- (2016) Art Sedrakyan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The MRI-Linear Accelerator Consortium: Evidence-Based Clinical Introduction of an Innovation in Radiation Oncology Connecting Researchers, Methodology, Data Collection, Quality Assurance, and Technical Development
- (2016) Linda G. W. Kerkmeijer et al. Frontiers in Oncology
- The evaluation of innovation in radiation oncology – what can we do and what should we do?
- (2015) Jean-Philippe Pignol et al. ACTA ONCOLOGICA
- Predicting Low Accrual in the National Cancer Institute’s Cooperative Group Clinical Trials
- (2015) Caroline S. Bennette et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Registry-based randomized clinical trials—a new clinical trial paradigm
- (2015) Stefan James et al. Nature Reviews Cardiology
- Predicting Low Accrual in the National Cancer Institute’s Cooperative Group Clinical Trials
- (2015) Caroline S. Bennette et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- PROceeding With the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
- (2015) Benjamin Movsas JAMA Oncology
- Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
- (2015) Amylou C. Dueck et al. JAMA Oncology
- Traditional Phase 1 and 2 Studies in Thoracic Radiation Oncology Should Be Abandoned
- (2014) Corinne Faivre-Finn et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
- Psychosocial/Survivorship Issues in Breast Cancer: Are We Doing Better?
- (2014) L. Fallowfield et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer: Current Status and Future Developments
- (2014) Clara Chan et al. Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Creating a data exchange strategy for radiotherapy research: Towards federated databases and anonymised public datasets
- (2014) Tomas Skripcak et al. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
- Selection of patients for radiotherapy with protons aiming at reduction of side effects: The model-based approach
- (2013) Johannes A. Langendijk et al. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
- The Body of Evidence for Advanced Technology in Radiation Oncology
- (2012) J. E. Bekelman et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Proton Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Patterns of Care and Early Toxicity
- (2012) James B. Yu et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Proof of concept of MRI-guided tracked radiation delivery: tracking one-dimensional motion
- (2012) S P M Crijns et al. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
- A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- (2012) Gang Peng et al. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
- Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial
- (2011) Christopher M Nutting et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Quality, Technology and Outcomes: Evolution and Evaluation of New Treatments and/or New Technology
- (2011) Benedick A. Fraass et al. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY
- A Clinical Approach to Technology Assessment: How Do We and How Should We Choose the Right Treatment?
- (2011) Anthony Zietman et al. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY
- Cancer Clinical Trials — A Chronic but Curable Crisis
- (2010) Robert C. Young NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations
- (2009) Peter McCulloch et al. LANCET
- Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations
- (2009) Jeffrey S Barkun et al. LANCET
- Integrating a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: proof of concept
- (2009) B W Raaymakers et al. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
- A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy to Reduce Acute Radiation Dermatitis
- (2008) Jean-Philippe Pignol et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Evidence behind use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review of comparative clinical studies
- (2008) Liv Veldeman et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started