Distributions ofp-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?

Problems in usingp-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate ofp-hacking and evidential value

(2016) Dorothy V.M. Bishop et al.   PeerJ

Comment: What p-hacking really looks like: A comment on Masicampo and LaLande (2012)

(2015) Daniël Lakens   QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY

The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science

(2015) Megan L. Head et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

On the challenges of drawing conclusions fromp-values just below 0.05

(2015) Daniël Lakens   PeerJ

A surge ofp-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)

(2015) Joost CF de Winter et al.   PeerJ

The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature

(2015) Michał Krawczyk   PLoS One

Publication Bias in Psychology: A Diagnosis Based on the Correlation between Effect Size and Sample Size

(2014) Anton Kühberger et al.   PLoS One

Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science

(2014) Coosje L. S. Veldkamp et al.   PLoS One

Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer

(2014) A. Franco et al.   SCIENCE

Discussion: Difficulties in making inferences about scientific truth from distributions of published p-values

(2013) A. Gelman et al.   BIOSTATISTICS

An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature

(2013) L. R. Jager et al.   BIOSTATISTICS

Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and applications to top medical journals by Jager and Leek

(2013) Y. Benjamini et al.   BIOSTATISTICS

Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature

(2013) S. N. Goodman   BIOSTATISTICS

Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false

(2013) J. P. A. Ioannidis   BIOSTATISTICS

The Life of p: “Just Significant” Results are on the Rise

(2013) Nathan C. Leggett et al.   QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY

A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05

(2012) E.J. Masicampo et al.   QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY

Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases

(2010) Marco Pautasso   SCIENTOMETRICS