标题
Distributions ofp-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?
作者
关键词
-
出版物
PeerJ
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages e1935
出版商
PeerJ
发表日期
2016-04-11
DOI
10.7717/peerj.1935
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Problems in usingp-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate ofp-hacking and evidential value
- (2016) Dorothy V.M. Bishop et al. PeerJ
- Comment: What p-hacking really looks like: A comment on Masicampo and LaLande (2012)
- (2015) Daniël Lakens QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- On the challenges of drawing conclusions fromp-values just below 0.05
- (2015) Daniël Lakens PeerJ
- A surge ofp-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)
- (2015) Joost CF de Winter et al. PeerJ
- The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature
- (2015) Michał Krawczyk PLoS One
- Publication Bias in Psychology: A Diagnosis Based on the Correlation between Effect Size and Sample Size
- (2014) Anton Kühberger et al. PLoS One
- Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science
- (2014) Coosje L. S. Veldkamp et al. PLoS One
- Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
- (2014) A. Franco et al. SCIENCE
- Discussion: Difficulties in making inferences about scientific truth from distributions of published p-values
- (2013) A. Gelman et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature
- (2013) L. R. Jager et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and applications to top medical journals by Jager and Leek
- (2013) Y. Benjamini et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature
- (2013) S. N. Goodman BIOSTATISTICS
- Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false
- (2013) J. P. A. Ioannidis BIOSTATISTICS
- The Life of p: “Just Significant” Results are on the Rise
- (2013) Nathan C. Leggett et al. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05
- (2012) E.J. Masicampo et al. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases
- (2010) Marco Pautasso SCIENTOMETRICS
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started