Where Have All the Rodents Gone? The Effects of Attrition in Experimental Research on Cancer and Stroke
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Where Have All the Rodents Gone? The Effects of Attrition in Experimental Research on Cancer and Stroke
Authors
Keywords
Meta-analysis, Research errors, Research reporting guidelines, Cancer treatment, Drug research and development, Research laboratories, Simulation and modeling, Rodents
Journal
PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages e1002331
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2016-01-05
DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.1002331
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste
- (2014) Malcolm R Macleod et al. LANCET
- Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies; Missing Link in Translational Research?
- (2014) Judith van Luijk et al. PLoS One
- Distinguishing between Exploratory and Confirmatory Preclinical Research Will Improve Translation
- (2014) Jonathan Kimmelman et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Mapping of available health research and development data: what's there, what's missing, and what role is there for a global observatory?
- (2013) John-Arne Røttingen et al. LANCET
- Bringing rigour to translational medicine
- (2013) David W. Howells et al. Nature Reviews Neurology
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Why Even More Clinical Research Studies May Be False: Effect of Asymmetrical Handling of Clinically Unexpected Values
- (2013) Matthew James Shun-Shin et al. PLoS One
- When Mice Mislead
- (2013) J. Couzin-Frankel SCIENCE
- Whole Animal Experiments Should Be More Like Human Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2013) Beverly S. Muhlhausler et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Evaluation of Excess Significance Bias in Animal Studies of Neurological Diseases
- (2013) Konstantinos K. Tsilidis et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Threats to Validity in the Design and Conduct of Preclinical Efficacy Studies: A Systematic Review of Guidelines for In Vivo Animal Experiments
- (2013) Valerie C. Henderson et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Progress in Using Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies to Improve Translational Research
- (2013) C. R. Hooijmans et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Principled missing data methods for researchers
- (2013) Yiran Dong et al. SpringerPlus
- The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials
- (2012) Roderick J. Little et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy
- (2010) Emily S. Sena et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
- (2010) Carol Kilkenny et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies?
- (2010) H. Bart van der Worp et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started