Unequal Contribution of Widespread and Narrow-Ranged Species to Botanical Diversity Patterns
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Unequal Contribution of Widespread and Narrow-Ranged Species to Botanical Diversity Patterns
Authors
Keywords
Species diversity, Species delimitation, Plants, Gabon, Birds, Africa, Conservation genetics, Phylogeography
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages e0169200
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2017-01-10
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0169200
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models
- (2015) André S. J. van Proosdij et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Peri-urban conservation in the Mondah forest of Libreville, Gabon: Red List assessments of endemic plant species, and avoiding protected area downsizing
- (2015) G. Walters et al. ORYX
- Using species distribution models to inform IUCN Red List assessments
- (2014) Mindy M. Syfert et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Comparative phylogeography of African rain forest trees: A review of genetic signatures of vegetation history in the Guineo-Congolian region
- (2013) Olivier J. Hardy et al. COMPTES RENDUS GEOSCIENCE
- A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter
- (2013) Cory Merow et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Accounting for the capacity of common and rare species to contribute to diversity spatial patterns: Is it a sampling issue or a biological effect?
- (2013) A.D. Mazaris et al. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
- Stacking species distribution models and adjusting bias by linking them to macroecological models
- (2013) Justin M. Calabrese et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data
- (2013) Canran Liu et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Partial versus Full Species Distribution Models
- (2013) Niels Raes Natureza & Conservacao
- Is Rich and Rare the Common Share? Describing Biodiversity Patterns to Inform Conservation Practices for South American Anurans
- (2013) Fabricio Villalobos et al. PLoS One
- Hyperdominance in the Amazonian Tree Flora
- (2013) H. ter Steege et al. SCIENCE
- Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness in biogeographic transitions regions: Woody plants of Uruguay
- (2012) Analía Pérez-Quesada et al. AUSTRAL ECOLOGY
- Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance
- (2012) Carsten F. Dormann et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling
- (2012) Miguel B. Araújo et al. ECOLOGY
- Legume Diversity Patterns in West Central Africa: Influence of Species Biology on Distribution Models
- (2012) Manuel de la Estrella et al. PLoS One
- Are richness patterns of common and rare species equally well explained by environmental variables?
- (2010) Jack J. Lennon et al. ECOGRAPHY
- The art of modelling range-shifting species
- (2010) Jane Elith et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Botanical richness and endemicity patterns of Borneo derived from species distribution models
- (2009) Niels Raes et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data
- (2009) Steven J. Phillips et al. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
- The contribution of common and rare species to plant species richness patterns: the effect of habitat type and size of sampling unit
- (2008) Antonios D. Mazaris et al. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
- Extinction Risk Escalates in the Tropics
- (2008) Jana C. Vamosi et al. PLoS One
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started