Presence and consequences of positive words in scientific abstracts
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Presence and consequences of positive words in scientific abstracts
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2023-11-04
DOI
10.1007/s11192-023-04864-6
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Information-Seeking Behavior for COVID-19 Boosters in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey
- (2023) Xiaoshan Austin Li et al. Vaccines
- ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing
- (2023) Tzeng-Ji Chen Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
- Linguistic positivity in soft and hard disciplines: temporal dynamics, disciplinary variation, and the relationship with research impact
- (2023) Xueying Liu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Sentiments analysis of fMRI using automatically generated stimuli labels under naturalistic paradigm
- (2023) Rimsha Mahrukh et al. Scientific Reports
- Evaluation of Citation Inaccuracies in Surgical Literature by Journal Type, Study Design, and Level of Evidence: Towards Safeguarding the Peer-Review Process
- (2022) Matthew Sauder et al. AMERICAN SURGEON
- Analysis of 567,758 randomized controlled trials published over 30 years reveals trends in phrases used to discuss results that do not reach statistical significance
- (2022) Willem M. Otte et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Has Psychology Become More Positive? Trends in Language Use in Article Abstracts
- (2022) Naomi Baes et al. Frontiers in Psychology
- Is academic writing becoming more positive? A large-scale diachronic case study of Science research articles across 25 years
- (2022) Zhou-min Yuan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature?
- (2021) Vedrana Pavlovic et al. CLINICAL SCIENCE
- The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement
- (2021) Christiaan H. Vinkers et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Explaining Negativity Dominance without Processing Bias
- (2021) Christian Unkelbach et al. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- Why Good Is More Alike Than Bad: Processing Implications
- (2017) Hans Alves et al. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review
- (2017) Kellia Chiu et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature
- (2016) Iman Tahamtan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The Use of Superlatives in Cancer Research
- (2016) Matthew V. Abola et al. JAMA Oncology
- The future of the postdoc
- (2015) Kendall Powell NATURE
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Academia’s never-ending selection for productivity
- (2015) François Brischoux et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis
- (2015) Christiaan H Vinkers et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis
- (2015) Christiaan H Vinkers et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The differential influences of positive affect, random reward, and performance-contingent reward on cognitive control
- (2014) Kerstin Fröber et al. COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE
- Incorrect Citations Give Unfair Credit to Review Authors in Ecology Journals
- (2013) Mariana C. Teixeira et al. PLoS One
- Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin”
- (2013) Eleanor A. Ochodo et al. RADIOLOGY
- Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies
- (2012) Francesca M.M. Citron BRAIN AND LANGUAGE
- Science and the Sources of Hype
- (2012) T. Caulfield et al. Public Health Genomics
- Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study
- (2012) Amélie Yavchitz et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Positive words carry less information than negative words
- (2012) David Garcia et al. EPJ Data Science
- A study of factors that affect the information-seeking behavior of academic scientists
- (2011) Xi Niu et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: potential causes and consequences
- (2010) BERNHARD STATZNER et al. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
- Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes
- (2010) Isabelle Boutron JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Role and reality: technology transfer at Canadian universities
- (2010) Tania M. Bubela et al. TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Understanding PubMed(R) user search behavior through log analysis
- (2009) R. Islamaj Dogan et al. Database-The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation
- Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials
- (2008) Graham G. Scott et al. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated
- (2008) John P. A. Ioannidis EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
- (2008) Neal S Young et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now