Is academic writing becoming more positive? A large-scale diachronic case study of Science research articles across 25 years
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Is academic writing becoming more positive? A large-scale diachronic case study of Science research articles across 25 years
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 127, Issue 11, Pages 6191-6207
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2022-10-01
DOI
10.1007/s11192-022-04515-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Over‐promotion and caution in abstracts of preprints during the COVID ‐19 crisis
- (2021) Frederique Bordignon et al. LEARNED PUBLISHING
- Erratum to: Linguistic positivity bias in academic writing: A large-scale diachronic study in life sciences across 50 years
- (2021) Ju Wen et al. APPLIED LINGUISTICS
- Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study
- (2020) Marc J Lerchenmueller et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Sentiment analysis as a measure of conservation culture in scientific literature
- (2019) Robert J. Lennox et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Rewarding negative results keeps science on track
- (2017) NATURE
- Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997–2016)
- (2017) Lei Lei et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review
- (2017) Kellia Chiu et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Readability and citations in information science: evidence from abstracts and articles of four journals (2003–2012)
- (2016) Lei Lei et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Sentiment analysis: A review and comparative analysis of web services
- (2015) Jesus Serrano-Guerrero et al. INFORMATION SCIENCES
- Human language reveals a universal positivity bias
- (2015) Peter Sheridan Dodds et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis
- (2015) Christiaan H Vinkers et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis
- (2015) Christiaan H Vinkers et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Positive words carry less information than negative words
- (2012) David Garcia et al. EPJ Data Science
- Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis
- (2011) Maite Taboada et al. COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS
- Objective assessment of scientific performances world-wide
- (2008) Claudio Nicolini et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started