Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 128, Issue 1, Pages 279-321
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2022-12-20
DOI
10.1007/s11192-022-04520-5
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- It’s Time to Terminate Social Work’s Relationship with the Impact Factor
- (2022) Daniel J Dunleavy SOCIAL WORK
- The effect of peer review on the improvement of rejected manuscripts
- (2021) Tom J. Crijns et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- Analysis of the new scopus CiteScore
- (2021) Hui Fang SCIENTOMETRICS
- The gender and geography of publishing: a review of sex/gender reporting and author representation in leading general medical and global health journals
- (2021) Rebekah Merriman et al. BMJ Global Health
- A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers
- (2021) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The citation impact of the Open Access accounting journals that appear on Beall's List of potentially predatory publishers and journals
- (2021) William H. Walters JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP
- Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy
- (2020) Kyle Siler Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality
- (2019) Simon Cooper et al. Clinical Nursing Research
- Perceived quality and self‐identity in scholarly publishing
- (2019) Lars Moksness et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
- (2019) Ketevan Glonti et al. BMC Medicine
- Conflicts of interest disclosure policies among Chinese medical journals: A cross-sectional study
- (2019) Jiayi Zhu et al. PLoS One
- Editorial team scholarly index (ETSI): an alternative indicator for evaluating academic journal reputation
- (2019) Yundong Xie et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis
- (2019) Michaela Strinzel et al. mBio
- Everything You Need to Know About Peer Review — The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
- (2019) Ann T. Gregory et al. Heart Lung and Circulation
- A scoping review of simulation models of peer review
- (2019) Thomas Feliciani et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution
- (2019) Charles W. Fox et al. Ecology and Evolution
- É Possível Desenvolver Revistas Médicas de Topo em Portugal?
- (2018) Tiago Villanueva Acta Medica Portuguesa
- Public health journals’ requirements for authors to disclose funding and conflicts of interest: a cross-sectional study
- (2018) Karim N. Daou et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- Editorial Evaluation, Peer Review, and Publication of Research Reports With and Without Supplementary Online Content
- (2018) Annette Flanagin et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Proposal of a stochastic model to determine the bibliometric variables influencing the quality of a journal: application to the field of Dentistry
- (2018) Pilar Valderrama et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- A new twist on peer review
- (2018) Mark Patterson et al. eLife
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements in neurosurgical journals
- (2018) Madeleine P. de Lotbiniere-Bassett et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
- Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
- (2018) Amytis Heim et al. BMC Medicine
- Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics
- (2018) Ernesto Roldan-Valadez et al. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
- Dispatches from the editor: how can we responsibly harness social media to improve our military health journal?
- (2018) John Breeze et al. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps
- Social media presence of scholarly journals
- (2018) Han Zheng et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Current and potential cyber attacks on medical journals; guidelines for improving security
- (2017) Mehdi Dadkhah et al. European Journal of Internal Medicine
- Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management
- (2017) John Mingers et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
- Characterisation of academic journals in the digital age
- (2017) Xin Gu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Gender bias in scholarly peer review
- (2017) Markus Helmer et al. eLife
- A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals
- (2016) James Galipeau et al. BMC Medicine
- Importance of Social Media Alongside Traditional Medical Publications
- (2016) Caroline S. Fox et al. CIRCULATION
- Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers
- (2016) Armen Yuri Gasparyan et al. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
- Avoiding ethics pitfalls in publishing: a perspective from COPE
- (2016) CA Pierson ORAL DISEASES
- Do You Ignore Information Security in Your Journal Website?
- (2016) Mehdi Dadkhah et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- How are Editors Selected, Recruited and Approved?
- (2016) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of “Instructions for Authors”
- (2016) Matthew T. Sims et al. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine
- Mistake index as a surrogate of quality in scientific manuscripts
- (2015) Antoni Margalida et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: the case of two SNIP versions
- (2015) Henk F. Moed SCIENTOMETRICS
- The probability of publishing in first-quartile journals
- (2015) Weishu Liu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals
- (2014) Armen Yuri Gasparyan et al. CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
- Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct
- (2014) Xavier Bosch JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- The Importance of Peer Review: Thoughts on Knudson, Morrow, and Thomas (2014)
- (2014) Mark G. Fischman RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT
- A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency
- (2014) Mai T. Pham et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Evaluation of Medical Journal Web Sites
- (2013) CATHERINE T. WITKOP CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Evaluating Journal Quality: Beyond “Expert” Journal Assessments in the IS Discipline
- (2013) Liang Chen et al. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMPUTING AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE
- Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals
- (2013) A. P. Sprowson et al. Bone & Joint Research
- A Comparison of Authorship Policies at Top-Ranked Peer-Reviewed Biomedical Journals
- (2012) Xavier Bosch et al. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by High-Impact Medical Journals in China: A Survey of Instructions for Authors and Published Papers
- (2012) Xiao-qian Li et al. PLoS One
- Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals
- (2012) Allison Hirst et al. PLoS One
- Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals
- (2012) Xavier Bosch et al. PLoS One
- Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access
- (2011) Sandra Miguel et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Longitudinal Trends in the Performance of Scientific Peer Reviewers
- (2010) Michael Callaham et al. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
- (2010) Danielle Levac et al. Implementation Science
- Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey
- (2009) E Wager et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials
- (2008) Stephanie L. Prady et al. PLoS One
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now