Gender bias in scholarly peer review

Journals invite too few women to referee

(2017) Jory Lerback et al.   NATURE

Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests

(2017) Lin Bian et al.   SCIENCE

Gender Representation on Journal Editorial Boards in the Mathematical Sciences

(2016) Chad M. Topaz et al.   PLoS One

An Examination of Gender Differences in the American Fisheries Society Peer-Review Process

(2015) Grace Handley et al.   FISHERIES

Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal

(2015) Charles W. Fox et al.   FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY

Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder

(2015) Ian M. Handley et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

The reviewer in the mirror: examining gendered and ethnicized notions of reciprocity in peer review

(2014) Bradford Demarest et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Impact of Homophily on Diffusion Dynamics Over Social Networks

(2014) Mustafa Yavaş et al.   SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW

Most of us are biased

(2013) Jennifer Raymond   NATURE

Science for all

(2013)   NATURE

Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science

(2013) Vincent Larivière et al.   NATURE

Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap

(2013) Helen Shen   NATURE

Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science

(2013) Lesley G. Campbell et al.   PLoS One

How women organize social networks different from men

(2013) Michael Szell et al.   Scientific Reports

Bias in peer review

(2012) Carole J. Lee et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Nature’s sexism

(2012)   NATURE

Stag Parties Linger: Continued Gender Bias in a Female-Rich Scientific Discipline

(2012) Lynne A. Isbell et al.   PLoS One

Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students

(2012) C. A. Moss-Racusin et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science

(2011) S. J. Ceci et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior

(2011) D. Centola   SCIENCE

Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups

(2010) Anita Williams Woolley et al.   SCIENCE

To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review

(2009) Robyn M. Borsuk et al.   BIOSCIENCE

Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations.

(2009) Stephen J. Ceci et al.   PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN

Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals

(2008) Judith Gedney Baggs et al.   JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING

Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence

(2008) Mark D. Humphries et al.   PLoS One

SOCIOLOGY: The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications

(2008) T. J. Ley et al.   SCIENCE

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors

(2007) A BUDDEN et al.   TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION