Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals
Published 2012 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages e35621
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2012-04-28
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0035621
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments
- (2013) Isabelle Boutron et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Enhanced quality and transparency of health research reporting can lead to improvements in public health policy decision-making: help from the EQUATOR Network
- (2011) Gilberto Kac et al. Cadernos de Saude Publica
- The international EQUATOR network: enhancing the quality and transparency of health care research
- (2011) Nikolaos Pandis et al. Journal of Applied Oral Science
- Results of a longitudinal study of rigorous manuscript submission guidelines designed to improve the quality of clinical research reporting in a peer-reviewed surgical journal
- (2011) Kathryn E. Wynne et al. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
- To publish or perish: How to review a manuscript
- (2011) J.C. Winck et al. Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia
- Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study
- (2011) B. R. da Costa et al. BMJ Open
- Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: An Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices
- (2011) Carol Bennett et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Adoption of CONSORT Statements for Randomized Control Trials Published in the Journal of Pediatric Nursing
- (2011) Cecily L. Betz Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families
- Longitudinal Trends in the Performance of Scientific Peer Reviewers
- (2010) Michael Callaham et al. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
- Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
- (2010) Iveta Simera et al. BMC Medicine
- Changing expectations: Do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?
- (2010) Hollis N. Erb PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE
- The EQUATOR Network: promoting the transparent and accurate reporting of research
- (2009) Chris Morris DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
- Peer Reviewer Training and Editor Support: Results From an International Survey of Nursing Peer Reviewers
- (2009) Margaret Comerford Freda et al. JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts
- (2008) Sally Hopewell et al. LANCET
- A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials
- (2008) Stephanie L. Prady et al. PLoS One
- Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project
- (2008) F Davidoff et al. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE
- Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
- (2008) Sally Hopewell et al. Trials
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now